6
$\begingroup$

Let $p:X\to S$ be the unique map from a (locally compact) topological space $X$ to a point. Since $\underline{\hom}(\underline{\mathbb{Z}},-)$ is the identity functor, we have that $\Gamma(X,-)=\hom(\underline{\mathbb{Z}},-)$ and so $$H^i(X,-)=\operatorname{Ext}^i(\underline{\mathbb{Z}},-)=\hom_{\mathsf{D}(X)}(\underline{\mathbb{Z}},-[i]).$$ We can then use the adjunction to write this as $H^i(X,-)=\hom_{\mathsf{D}(S)}(\underline{\mathbb{Z}},p_*- [i])$. In particular, we have that $H^i(X,\underline{\mathbb{Z}})=\hom_{\mathsf{D}(S)}(\underline{\mathbb{Z}},p_*p^*\underline{\mathbb{Z}} [i])$. The same kind of reasoning shows that $H^i_c(X,\underline{\mathbb{Z}})=\hom_{\mathsf{D}(S)}(\underline{\mathbb{Z}},p_!p^*\underline{\mathbb{Z}} [i])$.

Now, most references on Verdier duality would call $\hom_{\mathsf{D}(S)}(\underline{\mathbb{Z}},p_*p^!\underline{\mathbb{Z}} [-i])$ the $i$-th homology of $X$. I get that this is defined precisely in a way that recovers Poincaré duality in its general form. Is there more to it? Why does this deserve to be called a homology group?

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You might enjoy the related discussion around David Hansen's blog post totallydisconnected.wordpress.com/2021/03/08/… $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 30, 2021 at 16:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ .. as well as here: mathoverflow.net/questions/277069/what-is-homology-anyway $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 30, 2021 at 16:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If I understand well, it all boils down to "this is the dual of cohomology in some sense, so it deserves to be called homology". But this is only somewhat true in algebraic topology; it only holds over a field and if homology is finite dimensional. Also, in the case of coefficients in a field, we have less interest in homology (in this context), since we have a duality with compactly supported cohomology. (I can explain this better if anyone wants.) $\endgroup$
    – Gabriel
    Commented Oct 2, 2021 at 9:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Gabriel For the record, the restriction to fields is unnecessary, since we are working in a derived setting (that is $C^*(X)$ is the dual of $C_*(X)$ in the derived category, so the only obstruction is whether $C_*(X)$ is perfect (and so in particular equal to its double dual), which is true for example for every finite CW complex $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2021 at 7:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice Dustin is Dustin Clausen. $\endgroup$
    – Z. M
    Commented Oct 3, 2021 at 19:54

1 Answer 1

3
+50
$\begingroup$

One nice geometric way to view homology is a measurement of your space $X$ given by probing $X$ with other, nicer spaces, for instance, singular homology probes with simplices. One good reason to call this abstract thing homology is that it too admits elements corresponding to nice enough maps from test objects into $X$.

Lets work in a general six functor formalism, but I'm secretly thinking of constructible sheaves on nice spaces. Then we have our unit object $\mathbf{1}$ ($\underline{\mathbb{Z}}$ in our case) and a dualising object $p^!\mathbf{1}:=\omega$, in our case, this is the usual dualising sheaf $p^!\underline{\mathbb{Z}}$.

Then we can define a "smooth" object $Z$ to be one which admits an isomorphism $\gamma:\mathbf{1}_Z\rightarrow \omega_Z[-d_Z]$, for some integer $d_Z$. In the constructible/sheafy setting, manifolds give plenty of examples of "smooth" objects, and $d_Z$ is the dimension.

Then if we have $Z$ a closed subset of $X$, or more generally, if $i_*\cong i_!$ for $i:Z\rightarrow X$, then we have the following map, where all arrows are coming from adjunctions in our formalism, except the second one which says $Z$ is "smooth".

$$\mathbf{1}_X\rightarrow i_*\mathbf{1_Z}\xrightarrow{i_*\gamma} i_*\omega_Z[-d_Z]\xrightarrow{\cong}i_!\omega_Z[-d_Z]\rightarrow\omega_X[-d_Z]$$

So the formalism gives us elements of this group for each "smooth" closed subset $Z$ in $X$, so in my mind, this deserves the label of homology, it admits a direct link to the geometry of nice subsets of your space!

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .