3
$\begingroup$

Let $P$ be a finite poset and for $n\in\mathbb N$, let $\bf n$ denote the $n$-element totally ordered set.

If $m,n\in\mathbb N$ and $1<m<n$, is the dimension of $P\times \bf m$ equal to the dimension of $P\times\bf n$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Please explain what you mean by "dimension". $\endgroup$
    – F. C.
    Aug 11, 2021 at 13:58
  • $\begingroup$ The smallest number of totally ordered sets such that a poset can be order-embedded into a product of those totally ordered sets. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_dimension $\endgroup$
    – Tri
    Aug 11, 2021 at 14:20
  • $\begingroup$ Tri, "product" or "intersection"? $\endgroup$
    – Wlod AA
    Oct 12, 2023 at 1:44

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Let $k$ be the dimension of $P$. This means that $P$ can be embedded into a direct product of $k$ chains, but it cannot be embedded into a direct product of less than $k$ chains.

Now if $$ P \hookrightarrow C_1 \times \dots \times C_k $$ then of course $$ P \times \mathbf{n} \hookrightarrow C_1 \times \dots \times C_k \times \mathbf{n} $$ which shows that the dimension of $ P \times \mathbf{n} $ is at most $k+1$. On the other hand, it is also clear the dimension of $P$ is less than or equal than the dimension of $P \times \mathbf{n}$.

So the only possible values for the dimension of a product of $P$ and a finite chain are either $k$ or $k+1$. We can infer that for infinitely many values of $m$ and $n$ indeed the dimensions of $P \times \mathbf{n}$ and $P \times \mathbf{m}$ will be the same. I conjecture that they will all be equal to $k+1$ and thus equal to each other; but I cannot as yet prove or disprove it.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.