7
$\begingroup$

Disclaimer: I know absolutely nothing about p-adic cohomology, so it is possible that even the premises of this question are incorrect. But it turns out that I need to apply the theory of rigid cohomology to something in a very different field, so here I am...

Let $k$ be a perfect field of characteristic $p$. For $X$ a smooth projective variety over $k$, we can consider its crystalline cohomology $H^*_{cris}(X/W(k)),$ which is a finitely generated module over the ring $W(k)$ of Witt vectors.

Now let $X$ be a general variety over $k$. I can consider its rigid cohomology $H^*_{rig}(X)$. This is a finitely generated $W(k)\otimes\mathbb{Q}$-module, and for $X$ smooth projective, it matches up with $H^*_{cris}(X/W(k))\otimes\mathbb{Q}$.

My question is:

Is there a naturally defined cohomology theory $H^*_{?}(X/W(k)),$ giving finitely generated $W(k)$-modules for any variety $X$, so that $H^*_{?}(X/W(k))\otimes\mathbb{Q}$ recovers rigid cohomology?

For $X$ affine, I know that there is work on integral Monsky-Washnitzer cohomology (e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7307 by Davis-Zureick-Brown) but my impression is that this is not supposed to be finitely generated in general.

Actually, I would like a version of this that would work with arithmetic $D$-module coefficients, but that is maybe too much to ask for...

$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I think it's known that integral MW cohomology is definitely not fg in general, because it agrees (I believe) with integral de Rham--Witt cohomology, and there are explicit examples due to Ertl and Shiho where finite generation of this cohomology fails: doi.org/10.2748/tmj/1601085622 $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2021 at 20:07
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidLoeffler I think that we do not even need something as strong as Ertl–Shiho: the p-completion of integral Monsky–Washnitzer cohomology seems to be crystalline cohomology, thus it is not f.g even for the affine line. Ertl–Shiho is analyzing its image in rigid cohomology, which is subtler. $\endgroup$
    – Z. M
    Commented Oct 29 at 15:59

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

There has been some progress on this question since the question was asked. Apparently it was "known to the experts" that there cannot be an integral $p$-adic cohomology theory which is finitely generated, agrees with rigid cohomology rationally and satisfies finite étale descent. This was mentioned by Richard Crew at least at the 2017 conference "$p$-adic cohomology and arithmetic applications" at BIRS. The complete argument (failure of descent along Artin-Schreier covers) is very nicely written up in [AC22].

If one assumes some strong form of resolution of singularities in positive characteristic, then [ESS23] shows that there is a "good" (well-defined, functorial, finitely generated, rationally agrees with rigid cohomology,...) integral $p$-adic cohomology theory which satisfies $\mathrm{cdh}$-descent. It is given by sending a variety $X$ to the logarithmic crystalline cohomology of an appropriate normal crossings compactification $(\overline{X},\overline{X}\setminus X$)$.

Without assuming resolution of singularities, there is [Mer24] which proves that a "good" integral $p$-adic cohomology theory satisfying Nisnevich descent exists. If one assumes some version of resolution of singularities, it is shown that this theory agrees with the cohomology theory in [ESS23].

As far as I know, none of this has been worked out with coefficients yet.


[AC22] T. Abe, R. Crew, Integral $p$-adic cohomology theories, 2022, arXiv:2108.07608v2

[ESS23] V. Ertl, A. Shiho, J. Sprang, Integral $p$-adic cohomology theories for open and singular varieties, 2023, arXiv:2105.11009v2

[Mer24] A. Merici, A motivic integral $p$-adic cohomology, 2024, arXiv:2211.14303v4

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .