The answers to both questions are Yes.
Let $F$ be a field of characteristic 0 and ${\overline F}$ be a fixed algebraic closure of $F$.
Let $G$ be a connected reductive $F$-group.
By abuse of notation we identify $G$ with the set of ${\overline F}$-points $G({\overline F})$.
Let $G_s$ denote the subset of semisimple elements in $G$.
For a natural number $n>1$ we consider the map
$$\varphi_n\colon G\to G,\quad g\mapsto g^n.$$
Proposition 1. $\varphi_n(G_s)=G_s$.
Proof.
Let $s\in G_s$. It is known that $s\in T$ for some maximal torus $T\subseteq G$.
For an element $s\in T$, it is clear that there exists an element $s'\in T\subseteq G_s$
such that $(s')^n=s$, which proves the proposition.
Theorem 2. The set $\varphi_n(G(F))$ is Zariski-dense in $G$.
Proof. Let $U\subseteq G$ be a nonempty open subset.
Consider the open subset $U_n:=\varphi_n^{-1}(U)\subseteq G$.
We show that $U_n$ is nonempty.
Indeed, consider the subset of regular semisimple elements $G_r\subseteq G_s\subseteq G$.
It is known that $G_r$ is open and nonempty.
Thus $U\cap G_r$ is open and nonempty.
Since $U\cap G_r\subseteq G_s$, by Proposition 1 $\varphi_n^{-1}(U\cap G_r)$ is nonempty.
Thus $U_n=\varphi_n^{-1}(U)$ is indeed nonempty.
By Corollary 18.3 in Borel's book (2nd edition) the set $G(F)$ is Zariski-dense in $G$.
Thus there exists an $F$-point $g\in G(F)\cap U_n$. Then $g^n=\varphi_n(g)\in \varphi_n(G(F))\cap U$.
Thus $\varphi_n(G(F))$ is Zariski-dense in $G$, as required.