Let $R$ a commutative ring with one and $I, J \triangleleft R$ two ideals. The saturated ideal $I^{sat}_J$ with respect $J$ is the ideal
$$(I : J^\infty )= \cup_{n \geq 1} (I:J^n)$$
where $(I:J^n)= \{r \in R \mid rJ^n \subset I \}$. Fine.
Which intuition could one have thinking about this construction and why is it so fruitful? Is there any way to understand what happens with an ideal after saturation? On the geometrical part it is know that
$V(((I : J^\infty ))= \overline{V(I) \backslash V(J)} \subset \operatorname{Spec} R$. the bar is the closure wrt Zariski topology on $\operatorname{Spec} R$. Is this the only geometric way one should think about them?
if we assume that $I$ is saturated wrt $J$, ie $(I : J^\infty )=I$ this leads to odd implication $V(I)= \overline{V(I) \backslash V(J)}$. What does this mean, how these guys look like? Is there any "picture" one should have in mind? How they behave wrt localizations and taking radicals?
Another as the title suggests more important facet of my question is what advantages have the saturated ideals in contrast to non saturated from viewpoint of computational algebra, ie when one deals with concrete computations of eg radicals or minimal generator systems of ideals in quotient rings $k[x_1,x_2,...,x_n]/I$? Do saturated ideals have from this point of view nice features?