1
$\begingroup$

Suppose that I'm given a sample from time-series $(x_n)_{n=1}^N$ and want to decide if it comes from an OU process or not. Is there a (rigorous) test I can use?

So far, everything I've seen is hand-wavy...

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand\th{\theta}$ $\newcommand\Si{\Sigma}$ The Ornstein--Uhlenbeck (OU) process is a Gaussian process, with the mean and covariance functions being known functions depending on $s\le4$ unknown real-valued parameters of the OU process. So, for the sample $X:=(x_1,\dots,x_n)$, we know the functions $\mu$ and $\Si$ given by $\mu(\th):=E_\th X$ and $\Si(\th):=Cov_\th X$ for all $s$-tuples $\th$ of the real-valued parameters. Then $$Z(\th):=\Si(\th)^{-1/2}(X-\mu(\th))$$ has the standard normal distribution in $\mathbb R^n$.

Now using appropriate estimates of $\th$ and partitioning $\mathbb R^n$ into some number $k>s+1$ of disjoint Lebesgue-measurable sets of nonzero (say the same) Gaussian measure, we can use e.g. a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, with a test statistic distributed approximately as $\chi^2$ with $k-s-1$ degrees of freedom, as described e.g. by Watson.


Another goodness-of-fit test, based on a strict negative definiteness of Euclidean distance, is described in Section 3 of the paper by Székely and Rizzo.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ What is the advantages of the latter method? $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Jun 1, 2020 at 7:48
  • $\begingroup$ In Sections 5 and 6 of their paper, Székely and Rizzo provide comparisons with a few other tests. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 1, 2020 at 15:54
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, Iosif. This is very interesting and useful actually. $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Jun 2, 2020 at 9:04
  • $\begingroup$ I am glad this helped. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 2, 2020 at 13:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .