As the title says, when is the module of Kahler differentials a free module? In particular, are there known conditions or criterions that could be met that ensures that it will be free?

For example, if one has a finitely generated algebra $S=k[x_0,\cdots,x_n]/(f_1,\cdots, f_l)$ over a field $k$, then one could require that the generators induced from the $f_i$ for $\Omega_{S/k}$ be linearly independent. However, this is a very naive approach. I was curious if there something more interesting. For example, if the ring $S=k[x_0,\cdots,x_n]/(f_1,\cdots, f_l)$ (where $l<n$) has the property that the determinant of the matrix $(\frac{\partial f_i}{\partial x_j})_{i,j=1}^l$ is a unit of $S$. I am not entirely sure if that is accurate on the top of my head, but something along those lines.

Another question is, when is the module of differentials reflexive?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Freeness of $\Omega_{S/k}$ is very closely related to smoothness of $S$ as a $k$-algebra (one has to assume also that it has the correct rank, to avoid issues with characteristic $p$); this should be in most commutative algebra resources. If $S$ is not smooth, then it seems a bit subtle exactly when $\Omega_{S/k}$ is reflexive, but in general one expects to have both torsion and cotorsion (see, e.g., arxiv.org/pdf/1012.5940.pdf for the failure of reflexivity for some fairly mild singularities). $\endgroup$ – Devlin Mallory May 23 '20 at 1:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For $S$ as above, $\Omega^1_X$ is free of rank $=\dim X$ (X=\operatorname{Spec} S$ implies $S=k[x_0,\ldots,x_n, x_{n+1},\ldots x_m]/(g_1,\ldots, g_{l+m})$ where the $g_i$ form a regular sequence, that is $S$ is a complete intersection possibly after adding more variables. $\endgroup$ – Mohan May 23 '20 at 1:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Mohan Could you explain this a bit further please? Perhaps add some details? This would answer a huge problem I have been facing with these modules! $\endgroup$ – Plank May 23 '20 at 2:11
  • $\begingroup$ @DevlinMallory Ah yes, I see what you mean that these modules are closely related to smoothness. I mean this is the essence of smooth varities and when the sheaf of differentials is finite locally free, there is a lot of interaction. Thanks for the reference, that covers part of the question nicely! $\endgroup$ – Plank May 23 '20 at 2:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ To give one more precise reference (for $\Omega ^1_{X/k}$ free of rank $\dim X$ $\Longleftrightarrow \ X$ smooth over $k$): Kunz Kähler differentials, Theorem 8.1. $\endgroup$ – abx May 23 '20 at 7:59

This is just expanding my comment above (which I messed up forgetting dollar signs).

For simplicity, let me assume that $X\subset\mathbb{A}^n$ be a $d$ dimensional smooth variety with $\Omega^1_X$ free of rank $d$ (in characteristic zero, like your situation, it always is smooth, but in positive characteristic, you need to assume smoothness). Then, for a sufficiently large $m$, embed $\mathbb{A}^n\subset \mathbb{A}^{n+m}$ as a linear subspace and then $X\subset\mathbb{A}^{n+m}$ is a complete intersection. Here is a sketch of the proof.

Let $I$ define $X\subset\mathbb{A}^n$. Then one has the Euler sequence, $$0\to I/I^2\to \Omega^1_{\mathbb{A}^n|X}\to\Omega^1_X\to 0.$$

Thus $I/I^2$ is stably free. So, if we emebed $X\subset\mathbb{A}^{n+r}$, for large $r$, and call $I$ as the defining ideal of $X$ in this larger space, one gets $I/I^2$ to be stably free and large rank. A stably free module of sufficiently large rank is free by Bass's theorem. So, we may assume that $I/I^2$ is free (of rank, the codimension of $X$).

Now adding one more variable, say $y$, one can check that $I+(y)$ is in fact generated by the correct number of elements. For this, first pick a set of elements $f_1,\ldots, f_s\in I$ which generate $I/I^2$. Then by Nakayama, it is easy to see that there exists an element $h\in I$ such that $h(1-h)\in (f_1,\ldots, f_s)$ and $I=(f_1,\ldots, f_s,h)$. Then $I+(y)=(f_1,\ldots, f_s,h+y(1-h))$, proving what you want.

  • $\begingroup$ Another interesting source for this could actually be found within the following paper: jstor.org/stable/2042872?seq=1 "The Conormal Module of an Almost Complete Intersection by Ernst Kunz" $\endgroup$ – Plank May 23 '20 at 15:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.