3
$\begingroup$

Let $X:(\Omega,\Sigma)\rightarrow (\mathbb{R}^d;\mathbb{B}(\mathbb{R}^d))$ be a Borel-measurable random vector. What are some general classes of such random vector for which one can give a "lower concentration inequality" of the form: $$ \mathbb{P}(\|X\|^2>\lambda) \geq \mbox{(insert non-trivial lower bound)} $$ where $\lambda>0$.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Suppose e.g. that $X=X_1+\dots+X_n$, where the $X_i$' are independent zero-mean random vectors with $\|X_i\|\le1$ for all $i$. Then the Hoeffding--Azuma inequality (see e.g. Wikipedia) yields $$P(\|X\|>u)\ge1- e^{-(E\|X\|-u)^2/(2n)}$$ for $u\le E\|X\|$.

A number of lower bounds on $P(\|X\|\ge u)$ were obtained by de Acosta A. and Samur J.D. (Infinitely divisible probability measures and the converse Kolmogorov inequality in Banach spaces. Studia Math. 1979. V. 66, 143--160). For instance, a special case, for $p=2$, of their Corollary 3.1 on p. 151 is the following: $$P(\|X\|>u)\ge \frac14\,\Big(1-\frac{(u+1)^2+u^2/2}{E\|X\|^2}\Big)$$ for $u>0$, where $X$ is just as above.

Also, in the proof of their Lemma 2.3, de Acosta and Samur showed that, if the $X_i$'s are also symmetric, then $$P(\|X\|>u)\ge\frac12\,P(\max_i\|X_i\|>u) \ge\frac12\,\Big(1-\exp\Big\{-\sum_i P(\|X_i\|>u)\Big\}\Big)$$ for $u>0$.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Hmm. The Hoeffding-Azuma inequality you quote is not the one in the reference, and is actually wrong as the example $n=1$ and $u=E|X|$ shows. I believe there is a typo also in the reference you give (Bartlett's notes) - it should be an upper bound, not a lower bound, as the example t=0 (and the proof given there) show. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 19, 2020 at 20:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @oferzeitouni : Thank you for your comment. This is now corrected. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 20, 2020 at 0:30
  • $\begingroup$ How come the Azuma inequality becomes an anti-concentration one? The bound should be a concentration bound around the mean, not a lower bound on the probability to deviate from the mean. Am I wrong? $\endgroup$
    – CuriousGuy
    Commented Jun 26, 2023 at 14:49
  • $\begingroup$ @CuriousGuy : The lower bound here is not on the probability to deviate from the mean -- notice the condition $u\le E\|X\|$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 26, 2023 at 15:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CuriousGuy : The martingale is $(E(\|S_k\|\,|\,X_1,\ldots,X_{k-1}))$, where $S_k:=X_1+\cdots+X_k$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 26, 2023 at 19:46
0
$\begingroup$

Well, in your case notice that $\|X\|^2>0$ and so $\mu\triangleq \mathbb{E}[\|X\|^2]>0$. Thus, for any $\lambda \in \left(0,\mu\right)$ the Cantelli Inequality gives $$ \Pr(X\ge\lambda) \ge 1 - \frac{\sigma^2}{\sigma^2 + \lambda^2}, $$ where $\sigma\triangleq \mathbb{E}\left[\left(\|X\|^2 - \mu\right)^2\right]$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is interesting, but it only holds for small $\lambda$...not sure I'm I'm asking for too much... $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Feb 19, 2020 at 17:18
  • $\begingroup$ $0<\lambda<\mu$? $\endgroup$
    – kodlu
    Commented Feb 19, 2020 at 21:27

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .