4
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme, $U\subset X$ be an affine open dense subscheme. Is the underlying space of $U$ necessarily homeomorphic to the underlying space of $X$?

New contributor
drama_dorama is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ A variant was asked here: mathoverflow.net/questions/331673/… but Francesco's answer applies to both. $\endgroup$ – Bort May 16 at 12:16
  • $\begingroup$ OK I see, I lost the assumption "affine" from the linked question. $\endgroup$ – Bort 2 days ago
7
$\begingroup$

Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field, ad take $X=\mathbb{P}^2_k$, $U=\mathbb{A}^2_k$.

Then $X$ and $U$ are not homeomorphic, since $U$ contains two disjoint, Zariski-closed, irreducible subsets made of more than one point (think of two parallel lines), but this is not possible in $X$ because of Bézout theorem.

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

Let $X=\operatorname{Spec}R$, where $R$ is a discrete valuation ring. It consists if two points $x,y$ where $x$ is the generic point and $y$ is a closed point. Then $\{x\}$ is an open, dense, affine subset which is not homeomorphic to $X$, since it has fewer points.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

drama_dorama is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.