12
$\begingroup$

Let $k$ be a field, $G$ a finite group, and $k[G]$ the group algebra. Let $A$ be a subalgebra of $k[G]$. In general, $A$ is not the group algebra of some subgroup $H$ of $G$.

Question: Is there any criterion for when $A = k[H]$ for some subgroup $H$? Also, in that case, how do we read of the generating subgroup $H$? Will the situation become better/easier if I assume $A$ to be a sub-Hopf-algebra?

$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

10
$\begingroup$

The characteristic of the field is important here, when considering Hopf sub-algebras. The Cartier-Kostant-Milnor-Moore theorem says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra $H$ over an algebraically closed field $k$ of characteristic 0, is a semidirect product of a group algebra and an enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra. In particular, if $H$ is finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra over $k$, then $H$ is isomorphic to a group algebra.

This theorem is not true over algebraically closed fields in positive characteristics, as there are restricted enveloping $p$-Lie algebras that are finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebras but not isomorphic to group algebras.

See the introduction of https://cel.archives-ouvertes.fr/cel-00374383/document (by Nicolas Andruskiewitsch) for further information.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The CKMM theorem is very powerful! Is there a way to read off the group algebra part? $\endgroup$
    – Student
    Apr 19, 2019 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ I have only used this when I start with something finite dimensional, and then, as the result states, the Lie algebra part is not there. I don't know how to you find the group algebra part when you start with something which is infinite dimensional. $\endgroup$ Apr 20, 2019 at 7:35
7
$\begingroup$

Yes, there is a criterium. Assuming $G$ finite, $A$ is of the form $k[H]$ for some subgroup of $G$ if and only if $A$ is a sub-bialgebra (and since $G$ is finite, if and only if is Hopf subalgebra).

Clearly $k[H]$ is a Hopf subalgebra of $k[G]$, but if you take any subalgebra $A$, the fact that $A$ is also a subcoalgebra means that $A$ is a subcomodule of $k[G]$, hence $G$-graded, so, the $G$-homogeneous components are $1$-dimentionals and $A$ is generated by group-like elements. But a subcoalgebra of the form $k[X]$ with $X\subseteq G$ is subalgebra only when $X$ is a subgroup.

(By the way, if $G$ is infinite everything works fine except that $H$ is maybe a submonoid and not a subgroup).

An alternative proof avoiding the grading/comodule argument is the following: $A$ being subcoalgebra means $A^*$ is an algebra quotient of $k[G]^*=k^G$= the algebra of functions from G to k. But it is clear that any quotient of $k^G$ identifies with $k^X$ with $X\subseteq G$. The rest of the argument is the same.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Don't you need algebraic closure of the field for either argument to work? Or am i missing something ? $\endgroup$ May 31, 2019 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ No, you don't. The álgebra structure on $k^G$ is just $t\times k\times \cdots\times k$, the only ideales are puting zeros in some coordinates $\endgroup$ May 31, 2019 at 19:04
  • $\begingroup$ Ok. I was mainly refering to the grading/comodule part but in any case both arguments seem nice and clear. +1 ! $\endgroup$ Jun 1, 2019 at 1:40
  • $\begingroup$ in the grading/comodule case, the subcoalgebra $A$ verifies $(A)_g\subseteq (k[G])_g$ (because it is a graded subobject). But $(k[G])_g=kg$, so, $A_g=0$ or $A_g=kg$, because a sub-vector space of a 1-dimensional vector space is zero or everything. Again, being algebraically closed is not important, the point is that $k$ is a field. $\endgroup$ Jun 3, 2019 at 17:35
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MarcoFarinati: register and merge your accounts. Then you can edit your own posts. $\endgroup$ Jun 3, 2019 at 18:18
6
$\begingroup$

If $A$ is the group algebra of a subgroup, then $k[G]$ will be free as a module over $A$, and that may help to rule out some cases. This is not at all an "if and only if" statement, though.

Proposition 3.2.1 in Sweedler's book Hopf Algebras says that a cocommutative Hopf algebra is a group algebra if and only if it has a basis of group-like elements (those elements $x$ which satisfy $\Delta(x) = x \otimes x$). So if you have a sub-Hopf algebra, you can try to see if it has such a basis.

Ravenel says in Theorem 6.2.3 in Complex Cobordism and Stable Homotopy Groups of Spheres: "this is equivalent to the existence of a dual basis of idempotent elements $\{y\}$ satisfying $y_i^2=y_i$ and $y_iy_j=0$ for $i \neq j$."

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a characteristic assumption on the last part? Is there division by 2 in formula for y? $\endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Apr 18, 2019 at 22:29
  • $\begingroup$ Great! Also, I think Sweedler provided a fairly nice answer already, since if A comes from some subgroup, then A is automatically a sub-Hopf-algebra! $\endgroup$
    – Student
    Apr 19, 2019 at 0:03
  • $\begingroup$ For Ravenel's statement, I do not have access to the book for now. Would you mind pointing it out that in his content, is $A$ assumed to be a Hopf algebra? $\endgroup$
    – Student
    Apr 19, 2019 at 0:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Ravenel's book is available from his web page: web.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/mybooks/ravenel.pdf. He is certainly working in positive characteristic, but I don't know if this is necessary for his condition. He is certainly working with Hopf algebras, since otherwise there wouldn't be a multiplication on the dual. $\endgroup$ Apr 19, 2019 at 5:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @JoshuaGrochow: Ravenel uses his version to show that a particular Hopf algebra is a group algebra, so he found it useful. $\endgroup$ Apr 19, 2019 at 5:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.