4
$\begingroup$

If $f:X\to S$ is a universal homeomorphism, is $f':X\times_S X\to X$ always a nil-immersion? This seems to be easy, yet possibly I miss something. Should I give references to this fact in a paper?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ what is a universal homomorphism? $\endgroup$ Jul 16, 2010 at 8:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you mean "homeomorphism"? $\endgroup$
    – S. Carnahan
    Jul 16, 2010 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry! Certainly, I wanted to say "homeomorphism". $\endgroup$ Jul 16, 2010 at 12:27
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Mikhail, your terminology seems non-standard. I agree it's obvious that the map becomes an isomorphism on underlying reduced schemes, but it need not be an immersion and hence should not be called a nil-immersion (which I take to mean "closed immersion defined by quasi-coherent ideal sheaf whose local sections are nilpotent"). One already sees this for a non-trivial finite purely inseparable extension of fields (or any other finite flat radiciel covering of degree > 1). $\endgroup$
    – BCnrd
    Jul 16, 2010 at 12:54

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

In general, the answer is no. As Brian Conrad points out in the comments above, purely inseparable field extensions do not have this property. However (and maybe this is what you were getting at?), it is true that if $X\to S$ is a universal homeomorphism, then the diagonal $X\to X\times_SX$ is a nilimmersion.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.