I am trying to solve a problem on additive categories, that gives the following question on (non-commutative unital associative) rings: if for elements $a$ and $b$ of a ring $R$ we have $ab=0$ and $a+b=t$ is invertible then how can one verify the existence of certain $c$ and $c'$ in $R$ such that $ca+bc'=1$ (and so, $ca$ and $bc'$ are idempotents)?

It appears that this implication does not hold unconditionally; yet I would be deeply grateful for any hints that would allow to study it (note however that the case where $t-1$ is nilpotent is certainly simple). In this case I am interested in there is an extra conservativity assumption; in particular, in the quotient of $R$ by the two-sided ideal generated by $t-1$ non-invertible elements of $R$ do not become invertible. I have tried to relate my question with von Neumann regularity of elements of rings, but was not able to do this.

  • 1
    What do you mean by ``the case where $t$ is nilpotent is certainly simple"? By assumption, $t$ is invertible, so it cannot be nilpotent. – Victor Protsak Nov 4 at 19:13
  • I am sorry; $t-1$ may be nilpotent instead.:) – Mikhail Bondarko Nov 4 at 19:26

Q: If, for elements $A$ and $B$ of a ring $R$, we have
(i) $AB=0$, and
(ii) $T:=A+B$ is invertible,
then how can we verify the existence of $C$ and $D$ in $R$ such that $CA+BD=1$?

Let me start by describing an explicit example of a ring $R$ having elements $A$ and $B$ satisfying (i) and (ii), yet the desired elements $C$ and $D$ do not exist. Then I will describe some extra conditions which guarantee the existence of $C$ and $D$.

Let $\Sigma=\mathbb Z^{\mathbb Z^+}$ be the abelian group whose elements are the sequences $\overline{m}=(m_1,m_2,m_3,\ldots)$ of integers indexed by the positive integers. Define endomorphisms $A$ and $B$ of this abelian group by:

$$A\overline{m} = (m_1,m_3,m_5,0,m_7,m_9,m_{11},0,m_{13},m_{15},m_{17},0,\ldots)$$

$$B\overline{m} = (0,0,0,m_2,0,0,0,m_4,0,0,0,m_6,0,0,0,m_8,0,\ldots).$$

That is, $A$ ignores the even coordinates of $\overline{m}$, and orders the odd coordinates in the expected order, except inserts a $0$ at the coordinates indexed by a multiple of $4$. $B$ ignores the odd coordinates, orders the even coordinates in the expected order, but inserts $0$'s everywhere EXCEPT the coordinates indexed by a multiple of $4$. The main points to note are that

($\alpha$) $\textrm{im}(B)$ is (properly) contained in $\textrm{ker}(A)$, so in particular $AB$ is the zero endomorphism, and
($\beta$) the endomorphism $T:=A+B$ acts on the group $\Sigma$ by permutation of coordinates.

Thus, if $R=\textrm{End}(\Sigma)$, then $R$ meets all of conditions of the question. But $R$ contains no elements $C$ and $D$ such that $CA+BD=1$. Such a relation would force $\textrm{ker}(A)\subseteq \textrm{im}(B)$, which is false. Specifically, $$e_2=(0,1,0,0,\ldots)\in \textrm{ker}(A)\setminus \textrm{im}(B),$$ and this is in conflict with $CA+BD=1$, since $(CA+BD)e_2 = BDe_2\in\textrm{im}(B)$, while $1e_2=e_2\notin \textrm{im}(B)$.

Now let me mention some finiteness conditions which can be added to the problem to guarantee the existence of $C$ and $D$ so that $CA+BD=1$.

(1) $T$ is not just invertible, but it is a unit of finite order.
OR,
(2) $T^{-1}$ belongs to the subring of $R$ generated by $A$ and $B$.
OR,
(3) $T^{-1}B\in BR$.
OR,
(4) $BR=B^2R$.

Note that if (1) holds, and $T$ is a unit of order $n$, then $T^{-1}=T^{n-1}=(A+B)^{n-1}\in \langle A, B\rangle$ and (2) holds. Note that if (2) holds and if $R$ is generated by $A$ and $B$, then the right ideal $BR$ is actually a $2$-sided ideal, since it is closed under left multiplication by both $A$ and $B$. In fact, $BR$ is the $2$-sided ideal $(B)$ generated by $B$. Thus $T^{-1}B\in (B)=BR$, and (3) holds. Now, if (3) holds, we have $T^{-1}B=BD$ for some $D\in R$, so $B=TBD=(A+B)BD=B^2D\in B^2R$, which is enough to establish that $BR=B^2R$, so (4) holds.

Thus condition (4) is essentially the most general of these. Let me add that condition to the conditions of original problem:

Claim. If, for elements $A$ and $B$ of a ring $R$, we have
(i) $AB=0$,
(ii) $T:=A+B$ is invertible, and
(ii) $BR=B^2R$,
then $R$ has elements $C$ and $D$ such that $CA+BD=1$

Reasoning. $A+B=T$, so $T^{-1}A+T^{-1}B=1$. We have added the assumption that $BR=B^2R$, so $B=B^2D$ for some $D\in R$. Thus $B=B^2D = (A+B)BD = TBD$, and we get $T^{-1}B=BD$. Substituting this into the equation from the first line of this argument we get $T^{-1}A+BD=1$. Now let $C=T^{-1}$ to convert this to $CA+BD=1$. \\\\\

  • Thank you very much! I will try to relate your sufficient conditions to the conservativity assumption. – Mikhail Bondarko Nov 7 at 8:06

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.