4
$\begingroup$

Let $p$ and $q$ be probability distributions on a metric space $X=(X, d)$ with densities $dp$ and $dq$, such that there exists $0 < \alpha < \beta < \infty$ satisfying

$$ \alpha d p \le dq \le \beta dp . $$

What is an upper bound for the Wasserstein distance $W_d(p,q)$ ?

Notes: $W_d(p, q) := \sup_{\|f\|_{\text{Lip}} \le 1} |\mathbb E_{x \sim p}[f(x)] - \mathbb E_{x \sim q}[f(x)]|$


Update

It's well known (e.g see Gabe K's response below or Theorem 4 of this paper) that

$$ W_d(p, q) \le \operatorname{diam}(X)\operatorname{TV}(p, q). $$

Thus if $X$ has finite diameter, it suffices to bound $\operatorname{TV}(p, q)$.

Recall the definition of total variation,

$$ \operatorname{TV}(p, q) := \sup_{A \subseteq X} \left|\int_A dq-\int_A dp\right|. $$ Now, for any $A \subseteq X$, one has $ \int_A dq - \int_A dp \ge \int_A(\alpha-1)dp = (\alpha-1)p(A). $ Similarly, one has $\int_A dq - \int_A dp \le (\beta-1)p(A)$. Thus $$ \left|\int_A dq - \int_A dp \le (\beta-1)p(A)\right| \le \max(1-\alpha,\beta-1)p(A) \le \max(1-\alpha,\beta-1), $$ and so $\operatorname{TV}(p,q) \le \max(1-\alpha,\beta-1)$. Putting things together, we get

$$ W_d(p,q) \le \operatorname{diam}(X)\max(1-\alpha,\beta-1). $$

Case of infinite diameter

In case of infinite diameter assuming that $p$ or $q$ satisfies a Talagrand transportation-cost inequality, i.e

$$W_{d,2}(p,r)\le \sqrt{(2/\rho)\operatorname{kl}(r\|p)} $$ for some $\rho > 0$ and for any distribution $r$ on $X$ relatively continuous w.r.t $p$,

with a similar story for $q$ (e.g for standard Gaussian, this holds with $\rho=1$), allows us to still get an upper bound, namely $$ W_{d,2}(p,q) \le \sqrt{2\min (\beta\log(\beta)/\rho_p,(1/\alpha)\log(1/\alpha)/\rho_q)}. $$

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Do you want a bound using only $\alpha$ and $\beta$? $\endgroup$
    – gerw
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 11:54
  • $\begingroup$ Ya sure, a bound in terms of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ (and perhaps a the diameter of the space $X$ w.r.t $p$ ?!) :) $\endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 12:15
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps the dual form of $W_d(p,q)=\int_0^1 |F^{-1}_p(u)-F^{-1}_q(u) | \mathrm{d}u$ is useful here? $\endgroup$
    – Jan
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 13:10
  • $\begingroup$ Nope. That's only valid in 1 dimension. $\endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 13:12
  • $\begingroup$ Does "densities" here just mean Radon-Nikodym derivatives with respect to some (unspecified, but the same for p and q) measure on $(X,d)$? $\endgroup$
    – Steve
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 14:44

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Any estimate will need to incorporate the diameter of $X$. To see this, consider the interval $[0,L]$ and the distribution with density,

$$\begin{cases} \frac{2}{L} & 0 \leq x \leq L/3 \\ \frac{1}{2L} & L/3 \leq x \leq L \\ \end{cases} $$

One can calculate the distance from the uniform distribution $1/L$ using the dual formulation of the Wasserstein distance, and it blows up as $L$ goes to infinity. Therefore, we cannot hope for an estimate solely in terms of $\alpha$ and $\beta$.

However, assuming a bound on the diameter $D$ of $X$, then we can say more. With $\alpha$ and $\beta$, we can derive a bound on $\delta(p,q)$ the total variation distance between $p$ and $q$. One possible transfer plan from $p$ to $q$ is to move the excess mass of $p$ to $q$, fixing the overlap. The total mass to be moved then is $\delta(p,q)$, and the cost to move the mass is no more than $D^d$. Skipping some derivations, this shows that the Wasserstein 2-distance is bounded by $D \sqrt{ \delta(p,q)}$, so this gives your desired result. This can be generalized to the other Wasserstein metrics as well.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ sure. Thanks for the response (upvoted). Sure, I suspected it involve the diameter of $X$ w.r.t to $p$. See my comment section above. More precisely, it would involve something like $\sup_{x_0} \mathbb E_{x \in p} d(x,x_0)$ (which is $\le D$). $\endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 15:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ OK, i can workout $TV(p,q) \le \max(1-\alpha,\beta-1)$ and so $W_d(p,q) \le \max(1-\alpha,\beta-1)\operatorname{diam}(X)$ $\endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ Also this document provides numerous useful inequalities between metrics on probability measures math.hmc.edu/~su/papers.dir/metrics.pdf. In general to upper bound $W$ metric with another metric, you need an upper bound on the diameter of the metric space. $\endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Commented Aug 29, 2018 at 17:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, in case of infinite diameter assuming that $p$ and $q$ both satisfy the Talagrand transportation-cost inequality, i.e $W_{d,2}(p,r)\le \sqrt{(2/\rho)\operatorname{kl}(r\|p)}$ for any distribution $r$ on $X$ relatively continuous w.r.t $p$, with a similar story for $q$ (e.g for standard Gaussian, this holds with $\rho=1$), allows us to still get an upper bound, namely $w_{d,2}(p,q) \le \sqrt{2\min (\beta\log(\beta),(1/\alpha)\log(1/\alpha))/\rho}$. $\endgroup$
    – dohmatob
    Commented Aug 30, 2018 at 4:20
  • $\begingroup$ For sure. In fact, you only need to assume that either $p$ or $q$ (not both) satisfies a log-Sobolev inequality to get this. This estimate depend on the $\rho$ in the log-Sobolev inequality, so this introduces another ingredient while eliminating the diameter. $\endgroup$
    – Gabe K
    Commented Aug 30, 2018 at 14:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .