3
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a non-singular hyperelliptic curve (over $\mathbb{C}$) and $\pi:X \to \mathbb{P}^1$ be a $2:1$ covering. Let $\sigma:X \to X$ be the hyperelliptic involution and $E$ be a locally free sheaf on $X$ such that $ \sigma^* E \cong E$. Then, does there exist a locally free sheaf $F$ on $\mathbb{P}^1$ such that $\pi^*F \cong E$?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ No: Galois descent is not faithfully flat descent for generically Galois finite flat covers that are not etale. Choose $x \in X$ at which $\pi$ is ramified and let $z=\pi(x)$, so $\{x\}$ is $\sigma$-stable. The inverse ideal sheaf $E=O(x)$ is isomorphic to its own $\sigma$-pullback (even in a manner that restricts to a descent datum over $\mathbf{P}^1-\{z\}$, which you didn't ask to be satisfied but should have required). This $E$ is not the pullback of a vector bundle $F$ on the base, as otherwise $F$ would be a line bundle and $1=\deg(E) = \deg(\pi)\deg(F)=2\deg(F)$ is even, an absurdity. $\endgroup$
    – nfdc23
    Commented Jan 31, 2018 at 4:23

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Assume $\sigma^*E \cong E$. Then $E$ is a pullback if and only if the action of $\sigma$ on the fiber of $E$ at each ramification point of $\pi$ is trivial.

In the counterexample of nfdc23, the $\sigma$ acts by $-1$ on the fiber at $x$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Don't you need to assume the isomorphism $f:\sigma^*(E)\simeq E$ satisfies $f\circ \sigma^*(f)= {\rm{id}}_E$ (so it is a descent datum away from the branch locus)? $\endgroup$
    – nfdc23
    Commented Feb 2, 2018 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ @nfdc23: Of course you are right, the bundle should be equivariant. $\endgroup$
    – Sasha
    Commented Feb 2, 2018 at 16:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .