5
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a simplicial abelian group. Let $NX$ be its normalised chain complex denoted

...$\rightarrow NX_{K}$ $\rightarrow$ $NX_{k-1}$ $\rightarrow$...

Now define a new chain complex $Y$ by shifting the normalised chain complex; i.e. $Y_{k} = NX_{k+1}$. Now applying the functor from Dold Kan correspondence on $Y$ we get a simplicial abelian group $\Gamma(Y)$ whose homotopy groups are isomorphic to those of $\Omega X$, since simplical abelian groups are cofibrant-fibrant one can say $\Gamma(Y)$ is isomorphic to $\Omega X$ in homotopy category (using Whitehead's theorem) provided there is a map $\Omega X$ $\rightarrow$ $\Gamma(Y)$ inducing an isomorphism of homotopy groups.

My question is , is there such a canonical map $\Omega X$ $\rightarrow$ $\Gamma(Y)$ .

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

You can find such a map, but it goes the other way: $\Gamma(Y)\to \Omega X$. It is always wise to keep one's right adjoints on the right hand side.t

But first, let me note that every simplicial abelian group $Z$ is equivalent to $\prod_{k\ge0} K(\pi_kZ,k)$ (this is just a restatement of the classical fact that every chain complex of $\mathbb{Z}$-modules is quasi-isomorphic to its homology), so just the observation about homotopy groups suffices to conclude that $\Gamma(Y)$ and $\Omega X$ are equivalent.

Now, for the construction of the map, note that there is a canonical diagram $$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} Y @>>> 0\\ @VVV @VVV\\ 0 @>>> N(X) \end{CD} $$ equipped with a chain homotopy of the zero map $Y\to N(X)$ with itself (the latter is just the canonical isomorphism $Y[1]\to N(X)$).

Since Dold-Kan sends chain homotopies to simplicial homotopies, after applying $\Gamma$ we get a homotopy commutative square $$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} \Gamma(Y) @>>> *\\ @VVV @VVV\\ * @>>> X \end{CD} $$ which again induces the required map from $\Gamma(Y)$ to the homotopy pullback of the rest of the diagram, that is $\Omega X$.

There is a more concrete (although messier) way of obtaining the above map, and it is via constructing the adjoint map $\Sigma \Gamma(Y)\to X$. This is because you can get the suspension via the Kan suspension functor ([1], III.5) $$(\Sigma K)_n = K_n \vee K_{n-1}\vee \cdots \vee K_0$$ so to get map $\Sigma \Gamma(Y)\to X$ you just need to give maps $$(\Gamma(Y))_l=\bigoplus_{[l]\twoheadrightarrow [i]} Y_i = \bigoplus_{[l]\twoheadrightarrow [i]} (NX)_{i+1}\to X_n =\bigoplus_{[n]\twoheadrightarrow [i]} (NX)_{i}$$ for every $l\le n$ satisfying some compatibilities. Spoiler alert: these will just be the canonical inclusions.

In fact what we are doing is just identifying $X$ with $\bar W \Gamma(Y)$, where $\bar W$ is the Eilenberg-MacLane classifying space for a simplicial group ([1] Remark III.5.6).

[1] Goerss, Jardine Simplcial Homotopy Theory, 2006

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.