5
$\begingroup$

Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional complex vector space with a linear action of a complex reductive group $G$. Suppose that $\omega_0$ and $\omega_1$ are two $G$-invariant complex symplectic bilinear forms on $V$. Is there always a $G$-equivariant isomorphism $\varphi:V\to V$ such that $\varphi^*\omega_1=\omega_0$?

Remark. This is not true for real symplectic forms and compact Lie group actions [Dellnitz-Melbourne. The equivariant Darboux theorem. Lect. Appl. Math 29 (1993): 163-169].

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

It is true that any two $G$-invariant symplectic forms on a representation are equivalent. A proof of this fact is provided in F. Knop: "Classification of multiplicity free symplectic representations", J. Algebra 301 (2006) 531–553. See Thm 2.1 (b). Since the question is so natural, I suspect that thismust have been observed earlier, though.

The argument is roughly as follows: Let $(V,\omega)$ be a symplectic representation and let $U\subseteq V$ be irreducible. If $U$ carries an invariant symplectic form then one can find a copy of $U$ in $V$ such that $\omega|_U\ne0$. Then $V=U\oplus U^\perp$ and one proceeds by induction. If $U$ is not symplectic then $V$ contains a copy of $U^*$ such that $\omega$ restricted to $\overline U=U\oplus U^*$ is non-degenerate. Then $V=\overline U\oplus \overline U^\perp$ and one proceeds by induction.

The reason why the proof breaks down over $\mathbb R$ is that on an an absolutely irreducible symplectic representation $V$ a scalar $a\in\mathbb R^*$ transforms $\omega $ into $a^2\omega$. So $\omega$ and $-\omega$ are not equivalent.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.