6
$\begingroup$

I've read that the Tietze's extension theorem was still valid for continuous applications from a closed subspace of a normal topological space to a contractible topological manifold (understood as Hausdorf and 2nd countable).

But I can't find any clear reference for this result.

What I have found is that the theorem generalize to applications from a normal space to an Absolute Retract (but for which family ? Normal spaces ? Metric spaces ? both ?), that manifolds are ANR (Abolute Neighbourhood Retract, once again for which family of spaces ?), and that Contractible ANR implies AR. Is this correct ?

Is there a direct proof somewhere that Tietze generalizes to contractible manifolds ?

PS: it is not a research-level question, but I can't get any answer on MathStackExchange... sorry.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Let us say that a topological space $Y$ is a normal absolute extensor if each continuous map $f:Z\to Y$ defined on a closed subspace $Z$ of a normal topological space $X$ extends to a continuous function $\bar f:X\to Y$. By the Tietze Theorem, the real line is a normal absolute extensor and so is the countable product $\mathbb R^\omega$ of real lines and any retract of $\mathbb R^\omega$.

Since each Polish (= separable completely metrizable) space admits a closed embedding into $\mathbb R^\omega$, we conclude that Polish AR's are normal absolute extensors. This fact is explicitely written as Theorem 16.1(d) in the old book ``Theory of Rectracts'' of S.-T. Hu.

Now it remains to observe that each contractible topological manifold $M$ is a Polish contractible ANR and hence a Polish AR. So, $M$ is a normal absolute extensor.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.