1
$\begingroup$

Assume that $M_1, M_2, \ldots , M_k$ are $k$ disjoint compact submanifolds of $\mathbb{R}^n$ of the same dimension $m$. Assume that $\lambda_{ij}, \; 1\leq i,j\leq k$ are $k^2$ arbitrary real numbers.

Are there $k$ differential $m$- forms $\alpha_1, \alpha_2,\ldots, \alpha_k$ with $\int_{M_{i}} \alpha_{j}= \lambda{ij}$?

The motivation for this post is that a positive answer to the above question implies that the number of closed orbits of a planar vector field $X$ is less than the codimension of the range of the following linear operator:

$$L_X:\Omega^1(\mathbb{R}^2)\to \Omega^1(\mathbb{R}^2) $$

Because if $\gamma$ is a closed orbit of $X$ then for every $\alpha \in \Omega^1(\mathbb{R}^2)$ we have $$\int_{\gamma} L_{X}\alpha =0 $$

Now if $\gamma_1, \gamma_2, \ldots, \gamma_n$ are closed orbits of $X$ and we have $n$ elements $\alpha_1, \alpha_2,\ldots, \alpha_n$ of $\Omega^1(\mathbb{R}^2)$ such that the matrix $(\int_{\gamma_{i}} \alpha_{j})_{i,j}$ is an invertible matrix, then no nontrivial linear combination $\sum c_i \alpha_{i}$ belongs to the image of the operator $L_{X}$. This shows that the codimension of the range of $L_X$ is more than the number of closed orbits.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Erm... what prevents you from interpolating any forms you want on small neighborhoods of the manifolds? $\endgroup$ – fedja May 20 '17 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ @fedja thank you for your idea. What about the holomorphic case. Disjoint compact holomirphic curve in certain complex projective space? $\endgroup$ – Ali Taghavi May 20 '17 at 22:57
2
$\begingroup$

In order for integration of differential forms to make sense, we need $M_1,\dotsc,M_k$ to be oriented. Let $\omega_i\in\Omega^m(M_i)$ be such that $\int_{M_i}\omega_i = 1$.

Since $M_1,\dotsc,M_k$ are pairwise disjoint, compact subsets of $\mathbb R^n$, then they have open neighborhoods $U_1\supset M_1,\dotsc, U_k\supset M_k$ such that the $U_i$s are pairwise disjoint (see this Math.SE post). Let $h_i$ be a smooth function supported in $U_i$ and equal to 1 on $M_i$; it's a theorem that these functions exist.

The $\alpha_j$ in question is $$\alpha_j := \sum_{\ell=1}^k \lambda_{\ell j} h_\ell\omega_\ell.$$

When restricted to $M_i$, $h_i = 1$ and $h_j = 0$ if $j\ne i$, so $\alpha_j|_{M_i} = \lambda_{ij}\omega_i$ and $$\int_{M_i} \alpha_j = \lambda_{ij}.$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.