1
$\begingroup$

Let $K$ be a non-algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$ and $X_K$ a smooth, projective, geometrically connected curve defined over $K$. If $F$ is a stable locally free sheaf on $X_K$, is it also necessarily stable on $X_\bar{K}$, where $\bar{K}$ denotes the algebraic closure of $K$?

I know that this is certainly not the case in characteristic $p$ but could not find an example where things go wrong in characteristic $0$. An example or reference would be very helpful.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Let $K = \mathbb R$, and let $C = \{x^2+y^2+z^2 = 0\} \subseteq \mathbb P^2_K$ be the conic without a rational point. The projection $\pi \colon C_{\bar K} \to C$ induces a pullback map $$\pi^* \colon \operatorname{Pic}(C) \to \operatorname{Pic}(C_{\bar K}) = \mathbb Z$$ mapping $\operatorname{Pic}(C)$ to the subgroup $2\mathbb Z \subseteq \mathbb Z$. In particular, there is no line bundle on $C$ of degree $1$.

Now equip the vector bundle $\mathcal O(1) \oplus \mathcal O(1)$ on $C_{\bar K}$ with a Galois action by interchanging the factors. This descends to a bundle $\mathcal E$ on $C$, which can equivalently be described as $\pi_* \mathcal O(1)$.

Claim. The rank $2$ vector bundle $\mathcal E$ is stable on $C$, but its pullback to $C_{\bar K}$ is not.

Proof. The second statement is clear. For the first, note that $\mathcal E$ is semistable since it is so over $\bar K$. Thus, it suffices to show that it does not contain a line bundle of degree $1$. But $C$ does not have any line bundle of degree $1$. $\square$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.