I don't think your diagram is coming from a skew-symmetrizable matrix. Let $B$ be a skew-symmetrizable matrix and assume $Q = \Gamma(B)$ so your quiver is the diagram of $B$ as defined in Definition 7.3 of the linked paper. Then we must have
$$B = \begin{bmatrix}0 & x & y \\ \frac{-1}{x} &0 & z \\ \frac{-1}{y} & \frac{-2}{z} &0 \end{bmatrix}$$
with $x,y,z > 0$.
There also must exist a diagonal matrix $D = \mathrm{diag}(r,s,t)$ with $r,s,t > 0$ so that
$$DB = \begin{bmatrix}0 & rx & ry \\ \frac{-s}{x} &0 & sz \\ \frac{-t}{y} & \frac{-2t}{z} &0 \end{bmatrix}$$
is skew-symmetric.
So, $rx = \frac{s}{x}$, $ry = \frac{t}{y}$, and $sz = \frac{2t}{z}$ or equivalently $x^2 = \frac{s}{r}$, $y^2 = \frac{t}{r}$, and $z^2 = \frac{2t}{s}$.
But this leads to a contradiction since $\left(\frac{y}{x}\right)^2 = \frac{y^2}{x^2} = \frac{t}{s}$, but also $z^2 = 2\left(\frac{t}{s}\right)$.
All the variables above aren't completely necessary. Since all entries of $B$ are integers we see $x = y = 1$ and $z = 1$ or $z = 2$. Then then follows $r = s = t$ and the contradiction is $z^2 = 2$.