I have seen a theorem attributed to Chevalley, to the effect that a sub-semi-group in an algebraic group is Zariski dense if and only if the subgroup it generates is Zariski dense. Would anyone happen to have a reference?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Presumably the algebraic group $G$ is over an algebraically closed field $k$ and irreducible (to avoid silliness), so it is finite type (not just locally so). The Zariski-closure of a sub-semigroup is a sub-semigroup, so you want that if $M$ is a Zariski-closed subsemigroup and $M(k)$ generates $G(k)$ then $M=G$. It suffices to show $\dim M = \dim G$. By irreducibility of $G$, it suffices to show every element of $G(k)$ is a "word" in a bounded number of letters from $M(k)$. Now see Prop. 2.2 in Ch. I of Borel's textbook on algebraic groups. Chevalley's constructible image theorem is the crux. $\endgroup$
    – nfdc23
    Aug 7, 2016 at 1:44

1 Answer 1


Here is one proof. It suffices to show a Zariski closed submonoid M of an algebraic group G is an algebraic group. Let x be in M. The left translation by x is an injective polynomial morphism from M to M and hence surjective by Ax-Grothendieck. So xy=1 for some y in M. Since G is a group y is the inverse of x in G.

You should assume here the field is algebraically closed off course.

  • $\begingroup$ A very cool argument (though probably not the one Chevalley had in mind :)) $\endgroup$
    – Igor Rivin
    Aug 7, 2016 at 3:01
  • $\begingroup$ I think I learned it from either Putcha or Renner's book on algebraic monoids or from one of Brion's papers. I think there is also in one of those books a direct proof that the inverse of a matrix is in the Zariski closure of its powers. $\endgroup$ Aug 7, 2016 at 3:08
  • $\begingroup$ One interesting point is that this seems morally close to the "strong approximation" proof that I had in mind for cases of interest to me (Zariski dense-> modular projections are onto, but that last condition is obviously the same for groups as for semi-groups. Which is somehow very much Ax-Grothendeickian. $\endgroup$
    – Igor Rivin
    Aug 7, 2016 at 3:23
  • $\begingroup$ You can even avoid Ax-Grothendieck by observing that the translation (being an automorphism of $G$ as a variety) induces an isomorphism of $M$ with a closed subset of $G$ (hence of $M$). In other words, it is a closed immersion of $M$ into itself! The rest is an exercise (especially since $M$ is reduced) via dimension arguments. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2016 at 15:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Laurent Moret-Bailly, I think you can just use Noetherian condition on the descending chain of closed subsets xM > x^2M>... to get stabilization and then use cancellation. $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2016 at 20:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.