Physicists routinely wrote all 3 Pauli spin matrices as a vector.

$$ \sigma_1 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0\end{array} \right) \hspace{0.25in} \sigma_2 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & -i \\ i & 0\end{array} \right)\hspace{0.25in} \sigma_3 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1\end{array} \right) $$

This enables them to write shortcuts in quantum mechanics books such as:

$$ e^{ i\theta (\vec{v} \cdot \vec{\sigma})} = (\cos \theta) I + ( i \sin \theta) (\vec{v} \cdot \vec{\sigma}) $$

What kind of object is $\vec{\sigma}$ ? Is it a vector or a matrix or both?

Another example is when we write the curl as a determinant.

$$ \nabla \times F = \left| \begin{array}{ccc} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ F_x & F_y & F_z \end{array} \right| $$

Curl is not the volume of any kind of box. Is there a rigorous geometric meaning for these "abuses of notation"?

I asked this question on Math.SE and got a very literal answer, which did not help any. So I am asking here. You are welcome to answer there and call it a day.

Math.SE What kind of object is the Pauli spin matrix $\vec{\sigma}$?


The Pauli spin vector $\vec\sigma$ relates a two-component spinor $s={\alpha\choose \beta}$ to its corresponding three-component vector $\vec{v}=(a,b,c)$. In Dirac bra-ket notation the relation is written as $$\vec{v}=\langle s|\vec\sigma|s\rangle,$$ in components $v_i=s^\ast\sigma_i s$. A pair of unitary operations $\pm U\in \text{SU}(2) $ on $s\mapsto s'$ is thereby mapped onto a rotation $R\in \text{SO}(3) $ of $\vec{v}\mapsto \vec{v}'=\langle s'|\vec\sigma|s'\rangle$. The mapping is illustrated by this table

The usual vector identities do not apply to $\vec\sigma$, for example, instead of $\vec a\cdot(\vec b\times\vec a)=0$, one has $\vec \sigma\cdot(\vec v\times\vec \sigma)=-2i\,\vec v\cdot\vec\sigma$.


The Pauli spin vector encodes a two-complex-dimensional unitary representation of the Lie algebra $\bf{su}_2$. A basis of the Lie algebra maps to the matrix algebra $\bf{gl}_2(\mathbb{C}),$ giving a $3\times 2\times 2$ tensor. In 3 dimensions, physicists will sometimes blur the distinction between the basis for the tangent space and the Lie algebra of the Lorenz group $SU(2)$ at the origin, by the identification of $\hat{x}_i$ with the operator $\hat{x}_i\times -$ (this is not possible in higher dimensions), but these three matrices should really be thought of as parametrized by a basis for the Lie algebra.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.