Physicists routinely wrote all 3 Pauli spin matrices as a vector.

$$ \sigma_1 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0\end{array} \right) \hspace{0.25in} \sigma_2 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & -i \\ i & 0\end{array} \right)\hspace{0.25in} \sigma_3 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1\end{array} \right) $$

This enables them to write shortcuts in quantum mechanics books such as:

$$ e^{ i\theta (\vec{v} \cdot \vec{\sigma})} = (\cos \theta) I + ( i \sin \theta) (\vec{v} \cdot \vec{\sigma}) $$

What kind of object is $\vec{\sigma}$ ? Is it a vector or a matrix or both?

Another example is when we write the curl as a determinant.

$$ \nabla \times F = \left| \begin{array}{ccc} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ F_x & F_y & F_z \end{array} \right| $$

Curl is not the volume of any kind of box. Is there a rigorous geometric meaning for these "abuses of notation"?

I asked this question on Math.SE and got a very literal answer, which did not help any. So I am asking here. You are welcome to answer there and call it a day.

Math.SE What kind of object is the Pauli spin matrix $\vec{\sigma}$?


2 Answers 2


The Pauli spin vector $\vec\sigma$ relates a two-component spinor $s={\alpha\choose \beta}$ to its corresponding three-component vector $\vec{v}=(a,b,c)$. In Dirac bra-ket notation the relation is written as $$\vec{v}=\langle s|\vec\sigma|s\rangle,$$ in components $v_i=s^\ast\sigma_i s$. A pair of unitary operations $\pm U\in \text{SU}(2) $ on $s\mapsto s'$ is thereby mapped onto a rotation $R\in \text{SO}(3) $ of $\vec{v}\mapsto \vec{v}'=\langle s'|\vec\sigma|s'\rangle$. The mapping is illustrated by this table

The usual vector identities do not apply to $\vec\sigma$, for example, instead of $\vec a\cdot(\vec b\times\vec a)=0$, one has $\vec \sigma\cdot(\vec v\times\vec \sigma)=-2i\,\vec v\cdot\vec\sigma$.


The Pauli spin vector encodes a two-complex-dimensional unitary representation of the Lie algebra $\bf{su}_2$. A basis of the Lie algebra maps to the matrix algebra $\bf{gl}_2(\mathbb{C}),$ giving a $3\times 2\times 2$ tensor. In 3 dimensions, physicists will sometimes blur the distinction between the basis for the tangent space and the Lie algebra of the Lorenz group $SU(2)$ at the origin, by the identification of $\hat{x}_i$ with the operator $\hat{x}_i\times -$ (this is not possible in higher dimensions), but these three matrices should really be thought of as parametrized by a basis for the Lie algebra.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .