1
$\begingroup$

I asked this question two days ago om Math SE but didn't receive an answer: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1597321/generalization-of-hkh-kk-cap-h

Suppose we are given subgroups $H,K$ of a finite group $G$. Denote by $\langle H,K\rangle$ the subgroup generated by $H$ and $K$.

If $H$ normalizes $K$, then $\langle H,K\rangle =HK$ and $$(\langle H,K\rangle:H) = (K:H \cap K)\tag{$\ast$}$$ Is there a generalization of $(\ast)$ if $H$ isn't supposed to normalize $K$ ?

Comment: $(\ast)$ always holds for $HK$ on the left hand side (in place of $\langle H,K\rangle$) by he double coset formula and we have $\langle H,K\rangle =HK\cdots HK$ for a fixed number of factors. Maybe this property could be used in some way ?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think that for any pair of positive integers $m,n >1$ there is a cyclic group $H$ and $K$ of respective orders $m,n$ with $\langle H,K \rangle$ arbitrarily large. This is clear when $m = n =2$, for example. $\endgroup$ – Geoff Robinson Jan 4 '16 at 20:49
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't the generalisation just your comment?? $\endgroup$ – eric Jan 4 '16 at 21:00
  • $\begingroup$ @Geoff Robinson: Maybe one should expect a sum on the RHS ? $\endgroup$ – user63850 Jan 4 '16 at 21:02
  • $\begingroup$ I think the question is too vague in its present form. It has to depend on more that just $|H|$ and $|K|$, but when $H$ and $K$ are cyclic of the same prime order $p$ but $H$ and $K$ are not conjugate in $\langle H,K \rangle$, all $(H,K)$ double cosets have size $p^{2}$ ( so you have no chance of even knowing the number of double cosets unless you can already determine $|\langle H,K \rangle |$. $\endgroup$ – Geoff Robinson Jan 4 '16 at 21:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As you might have already noticed, you don't need $H$ to normalize $K$ for (*) to hold, only for the two groups to permute setwise. $\endgroup$ – Russ Woodroofe Jan 4 '16 at 21:47
2
$\begingroup$

I don't really know what you are looking for, but, for the record, if we know a full set $T$ of the $(H,K)$-double coset representatives in $G = \langle H,K \rangle$, ( so that $G$ is the disjoint union $\bigcup_{t \in T}(HtK)$), then, for each $t$, we $|HtK| = |t^{-1}HtK| = \frac{|H||K|}{|t^{-1}Ht \cap K|}$. Hence $[G:H] = \sum_{t \in T} [K: t^{-1}Ht \cap K]$.

So if we know how $K$ intersects with conjugates of $H$, and we can determine a set of $(H,K)$-double coset representatives in $G$, we can get a formula of sorts.

I don't know if Sylow invented double cosets, but he certainly made use of the formula above when he proved Sylow's theorem(s).

As I said in comments, it is sometimes difficult to determine the number of $(H,K)$-double cosets if you don't already know $|G|$.

Double coset decompositions are also useful in representation theory, for example in Mackey's formula for the restriction back to $K$ of a module induced from $H$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you Geoff, that is exactly what I was looking for. $\endgroup$ – user63850 Jan 7 '16 at 18:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.