15
$\begingroup$

As is well known, the tangle hypothesis of Baez and Dolan proposes that, for suitable definitions, the $n$-category of framed $n$-tangles in $n+k$ dimensions is the free $k$-tuply monoidal $n$-category with duals on one object. For ($n=1,k=2$) and ($n=2,k=2$) these have been proven respectively here and arXiv:math/9811139 (but in the latter case only for unframed tangles). These results are expressed in terms of "classical" notion of $n$-categories. By "classical" n-category, I will mean the usual notion of a structure, with objects, and $1$-morphisms satisfying coherence conditions up to $2$-morphisms, which themselves are required to satisfy coherence conditions, and so forth.

On the other hand, Lurie (arXiv:0905.0465) has proven a version of the hypothesis in the general case, but for a definition of $n$-category that is too abstract for a humble physicist such as myself to do much with.

I have two related questions:

  1. Are there are any more proofs of special cases of the tangle hypothesis in terms of "classical" $n$-categories, beyond the ones I gave? (Specifically, I am interested in the case $n=2,k=2$, but for framed tangles.)
  2. Is it possible to extract such results from Lurie's work? (Or in other words, can one translate Lurie's definition of $n$-categories into a "classical" one, at least in low dimensional cases?)

I realize that the "classical" definitions become increasingly cumbersome as you increase $n$, but for $n=2,k=2$ you are dealing with braided monoidal 2-categories, which are still fairly manageable, e.g. see this paper for a general definition of weak braided monoidal 2-categories and a strictification theorem.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.