3
$\begingroup$

We consider the $n$-dimenstional finite vector space $\mathbb{F}_2^{n}$ over the finite field of two elements. For a subset $A\subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^{n}$ of even size $|A|=2m$ and a linear form $l\in(\mathbb{F}_2^{n})^*$ let us say that $l$ bisects $A$, if $$|\{a\in A\ |\ l(a)=0\}|=|\{a\in A\ |\ l(a)=1\}|\,\,\,\,(=m). $$ Equivalently, for a subspace $L\leq \mathbb{F}_2^{n}$ of dimension $n-1$ (i.e. $|L|=2^{n-1}$), let us say that $L$ bisects $A$, if $$|A\cap L|=|A\setminus L|\,\,\,\,(=m). $$ How many subsets $A\subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^{n}$ of size $|A|=2m$ are there which are bisected by some suitable linear form (equivalently: by some subspace of dimension $n-1$)?

An alternative problem which I'm interested in (and which is maybe easier to solve??) is:

Determine the limit $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{|\{A\subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^{n}|\,|A| \text{ is even and $A$ is bisected}\}|}{|\{A\subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^{n}|\,|A| \text{ is even}\}|}. $$ (Clearly, $|\{A\subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^{n}|\,|A| \text{ is even}\}|=2^{2^n-1}$.)

(My calculations seem to support the conjecture that the limit equals 1.)

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Do you know any non-bisectable subset of even size? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 30, 2015 at 10:56
  • $\begingroup$ @Ilya: Yes, the smallest examples I found are some subsets of size 6 in $\mathbb{F}_2^4$. $\endgroup$
    – user50982
    Commented Aug 30, 2015 at 13:18
  • $\begingroup$ For example (writing vectors as rows): $A:=\{(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(1,0,1,0),(1,1,0,1),(1,0,1,1)\}\subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^4$ is not bisectable by a subspace of dimension 3. $\endgroup$
    – user50982
    Commented Aug 30, 2015 at 13:29

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The probability that a random subset is bisected by a fixed linear subspace is

$$ \frac{ \sum_{k=0}^{2^{n-1}}\binom{2^{n-1}}{k}^2}{2^{2^n-1}} = \frac{\binom{2^n}{2^{n-1}} }{2^{2^n-1} } $$

Using the asymptotic

$$\binom{N}{N/2} \approx \frac{ C 2^{N}} { \sqrt N} $$

for some constant $C$, we obtain

$$\approx \frac{2 C}{ \sqrt{ 2^{n} } }$$

for some constant $C$. (By $\approx$ I mean they are equal up to multiplication by $1+o(1)$ )

There are $2^n-1$ linear subspaces, so the expected total number of bisecting subsets is large, roughly $2C 2^{n/2}$.

Given two transverse subspaces, they divide $\mathbb F_2^n$ into four equal sets, and the probability that they both bisect is

$$\frac{\sum_{k=0}^{2^{n-2}} \sum_{l=0}^{2^{n-2}}\binom{2^{n-2}}{k}^2\binom{2^{n-2}}{l}^2}{ 2^{2^n-1}} =\frac{\binom{2^{n-1}}{2^{n-2}}^2 }{2^{2^n-1} } $$

using the same asymptotic:

$$ \approx \frac{ \left( \frac{ C 2^{2^{n-1}}}{\sqrt{ 2^{n-1}}}\right)^2 } { 2^{2^n-1}} = \frac{ 4 C^2} { 2^n } $$

So the probabilities that two different linear subspaces bisect a set are approximately independent. This means that the expected value of the square of the number of linear subspaces that bisect is roughly $( 2 C 2^{n/2} )^2$.

Let $X$ be this number, viewed as a random variable.

Because $E[X^2] \approx E[X]^2$, the variance of $X$ is $o ( E[X]^2)$, so the standard deviation is $o(E[X])$ so by Chebyshev's inequality the probability that $X$ is $0$ is $o(1)$.

This implies that the limiting probability of at least one bisecting subspace exists approaches $1$, as you predict.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain how you obtained the first equation? $\endgroup$
    – kodlu
    Commented Aug 29, 2015 at 10:31
  • $\begingroup$ @kodlu Sure. Using $\binom{n}{k}= \binom{n}{n-k}$, and then it counts the number of subsets of subsets of $[2^n]$ of size $2^{n-1}$ in a transparent manner - by counting, for each $k$, the number of subsets with $k$ elements in the first half and $2^{n-1}-k$ elements in the second half. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Aug 29, 2015 at 12:12
  • $\begingroup$ @Will: Thanks for your answer! In your comment explaining the first equation I don't get why you work with $2^{n-1}-k$. It's $k$ elements of $A$ in the first half and again $k$ elements in the second. Still, your first formula is correct. Also, its not "subsets of subsets", right? I will try and check the rest of your proof now. $\endgroup$
    – user50982
    Commented Aug 30, 2015 at 9:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Will: You mean "...so the expected total number of bisecting subspaces is large...", right? $\endgroup$
    – user50982
    Commented Aug 30, 2015 at 10:01
  • $\begingroup$ @user50982 The only reason to work with $2^{n-1}-k$ is to give a bijective proof of the first formula. I'm sure there's multiple ways to obtain it. And yes, I mean subspaces. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Aug 30, 2015 at 12:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .