2
$\begingroup$

For concreteness, let us work with the language of spectra introduced in EKMM.

In Strickland's paper "Products on $MU$-modules", he proves the following. If $R$ is a q-cofibrant commutative $S$-algebra which is even, in the sense that its homotopy is concentrated in even degrees, and $x\in R_d$ is a non-zero divisor, then the diagram

$R/x \vee R/x \to R/x\wedge R/x \to \Sigma^{2d+2}R$

induces a left exact sequence when applying $[-,R/x]$. This is lemma 3.6 in his paper.

Since $\Sigma^{d+1} R$ is the cofiber of the canonical map $\rho:R\to R/x$, this led me to consider the following more general question:

Let $A$ be an $R$-algebra. Denote by $\bar{A}$ the cofiber of the unit map $R\to A$. Is there a cofiber sequence $A\vee A \to A \wedge A \to \bar{A}\wedge \bar{A}$ ?

I tried playing around with diagrams but I got nowhere. It also seems the question would make sense in more generality, like in a stable monoidal model category with suitable additional hypotheses.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ If such a cofiber sequence existed for $A=R=S$, we would have $S\vee S\cong S$, which is not true. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 10:17

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

This will not work in exactly the form that you state, as you will see if you consider the case where $A=S\vee\overline{A}$; there is an extra factor of $S$. To fix this, you should replace $A\vee A$ by the pushout of the diagram $A\xleftarrow{}S\xrightarrow{}A$, which we can call $P$. It is then true that the cofibre of the natural map $P\to A\wedge A$ is $\overline{A}\wedge\overline{A}$. The easiest way to see this is to use the theory of total cofibres: given a commutative square $$ \begin{array}{ccc} W & \xrightarrow{f} & X \\ g \downarrow && \downarrow h \\ Y & \xrightarrow{k} & Z \end{array} $$ we can form the pushout $P$ of $f$ and $g$, then there are natural equivalences $$ \text{cof}(P\to Z) \simeq\text{cof}(\text{cof}(f)\to\text{cof}(k)) \simeq \text{cof}(\text{cof}(g)\to\text{cof}(h)). $$ Apply this to the square $$ \begin{array}{ccc} S & \to & A \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ A & \to & A\wedge A \end{array} $$ to get the earlier claim.

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .