13
$\begingroup$

It's easy to see that, for $1\le p,q< \infty$ the spaces $L^p(\Bbb R)$ and $L^q(\Bbb R)$ of $p$-th and $q$-th power integrable functions on the real line are homeomorphic as topological spaces. In fact, the map $f(x)\mapsto sgn(f(x))|f(x)|^{q/p}$ provides an explicit homeomorphism $L^p(\Bbb R) \to L^q(\Bbb R)$.

However this argument cannot be applied to the case where $p$ or $q$ equals infinity. Thus, I'm asking whether there is a homeomorphism from $L^\infty(\Bbb R)$ to any (and hence every) $L^p(\Bbb R)$ with $p<\infty$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 25
    $\begingroup$ Isn't $L^2(\mathbb{R})$ separable and $L^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ nonseparable? $\endgroup$ Feb 9, 2015 at 22:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A more interesting question would be: are $L^2({\bf R})$ and $C_0({\bf R})$ homeomorphic? $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Feb 9, 2015 at 23:07
  • 20
    $\begingroup$ Any two separable infinite dimensional Frechet spaces are homeomorphic. This is due to M. I. Kadec. $\endgroup$ Feb 9, 2015 at 23:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The $q/p$ should be $p/q$ if you want it to take $L^p$ to $L^q$. $\endgroup$ Feb 10, 2015 at 2:24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @PaulMcKenney I like the use of the rhetorical question... $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Feb 10, 2015 at 12:18

1 Answer 1

18
$\begingroup$

Paul is right. $L^2(\mathbb{R})$ is separable. (The rational simple functions ought to be one example of something ctbl. and dense.)

However, $L^{\infty}(\mathbb{R})$ isn't separable. By Jones' Lemma, if $L^{\infty}(\mathbb{R})$ were separable then any closed discrete (i.e., nonclustering) set must be of size less than continuum. But the characteristic functions $\chi_{[0,x]}$, $x\in[0,\infty)$, are pairwise of distance 1 from eachother.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ This was already pointed out in comments $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Feb 10, 2015 at 9:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ And I was clearly elaborating on that comment. $\endgroup$ Feb 10, 2015 at 12:15
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ We need answers, since comments are likely to go away in the future. $\endgroup$ Feb 10, 2015 at 13:07
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ We need answers, since questions without answers constantly float back to the first page. $\endgroup$ Feb 10, 2015 at 14:29
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Jones' Lemma seems like overkill here. Since the continuum-many functions $\chi_{[0,x]}$ are pairwise distance 1 in $L^\infty$, the continuum-many open balls $B(\chi_{[0,x]}, 1/2)$ are pairwise disjoint. Any dense set must contain points in every one of these balls, so a dense set in $L^\infty$ must have size at least continuum. $\endgroup$ Jan 4, 2017 at 20:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.