1
$\begingroup$

Let $(X,\omega)$ be a symplectic manifold, $L\subset X$ be a Lagrangian submanifold, $[L]$ denotes the Hamiltonian isotopy class. How to represent $L'\in[L]$ via $L$ (for example, a graph over $L$)? Is there an analogue to the $\partial\bar{\partial}$-lemma in Kähler geometry?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ There is no general way of expressing Lagrangian submanifolds like this in general. In the special case of a cotangent bundle $T^*L$, any Hamiltonian deformation of the zero-section $L$ can be written in terms of a generating function quadratic at infinity: see work of Chaperon and the paper F. Laudenbach and J.-C. Sikorav, Persistence d'intersections avec la section nulle au cours d'une isotopies Hamiltonienne dans le fibr´e cotangent, Invent. Math., 82(1985), 349–357. $\endgroup$ – Jonny Evans Sep 9 '14 at 16:06
1
$\begingroup$

If the complex structure $J$ compatible with $\omega$ is integrable for $X$, then of course you have $\partial\bar{\partial}$ lemma. A natural generalization of the $\partial\bar{\partial}$ lemma in symplectic geometry is given by the "symplectic cohomology" introduced by Tseng and Yau: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0909.5418v2.pdf. Here you need to replace the operator $d^c$ by $d^\Lambda$, and the definition is analogous to that of the Bott-Chern cohomology. Just as the Bott-Chern cohomology measures how far the $\partial\bar{\partial}$ lemma is away from being true for a general complex manifold, the "symplectic cohomology" introduced by Tseng-Yau measures exactly the same thing for a general symplectic manifold. Of course the terminology here is a little ambiguous, because usually symplectic cohomology is defined by a direct limit of the Hamiltonian Floer cohomologies $HF^\ast(X,wH)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.