Let $DF$ denote the category whose objects are categories and whose morphisms $F\colon R\to S$ are the discrete fibrations. This category has applications to the real-world problem of structuring data. You can think of any discrete fibration $R\to S$ as providing a schematic structure $S$ for more raw data $R$. This question is about finding a best such structure for given data.
For any category $R$, one can define the coslice category $$DF_{R/}$$ of discrete fibrations out of $R$. Given a discrete fibration $R\to S$, call $S$ the base space. I want to find a minimal base space $R^{min}$ for a given $R$. To get at that idea, I'll ask for some kind of universal object.
I once asked on the categories mailing list whether $DF_{R/}$ has a terminal object in general. As was explained to me by Mark Weber and Thorston Palm, it does not. Basically, if $R=\emptyset$ then we're asking for a terminal object in $DF$, and by cardinality arguments, this does not exist.
But in fact I was asking the wrong question. If I want minimal models, I actually want my discrete fibrations to be surjective. The counter-examples provided to me by Weber and Palm fail to cause a problem in that context. So here's the question.
Question: Define $DFS$ to be the subcategory of $DF$ in which the morphisms are discrete fibrations $F\colon R\to S$, required to be surjective on objects. Then does $DFS_{R/}$ have a terminal object $R^{min}$ for a given category $R$?
Edit provenance: An earlier version of this question got very little attention, so I've edited it to explain an intended application and to clarify the question a bit. The latter edit involved replacing "discrete opfibration" (and notation $DopF$, $DopFS$) with "discrete fibration" (and notation $DF$, $DFS$) throughout, because it looked cleaner.