2
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be a finite local ring (with identity) with exactly one minimal left ideal. Is it necessarily true that $R$ has exactly one minimal right ideal !?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The answer seems to be yes. In fact, the unique minimal left $R$-ideal is also the unique minimal right $R$-ideal.

Indeed, let $M$ be the unique maximal ideal of $R$. Then we have a sequence $$ 0=M^{r+1}\subsetneq M^r \subsetneq \ldots \subsetneq M^2 \subsetneq M \subsetneq R $$ of two-sided ideals.

Let $L$ be the unique minimal left ideal. Then $L= M^r$. Indeed, since $L$ is minimal, we have that $ML = 0$ by Nakayama's Lemma, so $L$ is contained in $M^r$, and equality follows from $L$'s uniqueness. Moreover, $L$ is a one-dimensional $R/M$-vector space (otherwise it would not be a minimal left $R$-ideal); thus $M^{r}$ is also one-dimensional.

Now, let $P$ be a minimal right ideal of $R$. Then $P \subset M^{r}$, since $PM=0$ by Nakayama's Lemma. Minimality implies that $P$ is a one-dimensional $R/M$-vector space. By equality of dimensions, we have that $R= M^r = L$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.