For a finite group $G$ with normal subgroup $H$, the induced representation $\text{Ind}_H^G(1)$ decomposes as a sum of irreducibles with the multiplicities equal to the dimensions, because it is is the pullback of the right regular representation of $G/H$. For a subgroup which is not normal, this need not be true. For example, take $G=S_3$ and $H$ a subgroup of order $2$. The index $3$ can only be written as a sum of squares as $1^2+1^2+1^2$, but $S_3$ only has two distinct $1$ dimensional representations.

Is the converse true? That is, if $\text{Ind}_H^G(1)$ decomposes into irreducible representations with multiplicity equal to the dimension, is $H$ necessarily normal in $G$? If not, is there some other characterization of subgroups which have this property?

The question arises in generalizing the 'Uncertainty Principle' for finite abelian groups $$ |G|\le \sharp \text{supp}(f)\cdot \sharp\text{supp}(\hat f), $$ to finite groups in general, and when the corresponding inequality is tight.

  • $\begingroup$ You may know this, but Theorem 2 in arxiv.org/pdf/math/0608702v2.pdf shows that the kind of uncertainty principle you quoted holds for compact (in particular finite) groups, appropriately reworded. $\endgroup$ – Gian Maria Dall'Ara Jun 14 '13 at 8:00

Yes, it is. If for any irreducible $\rho$, $\langle\text{Ind}_H^G(1),\rho\rangle$ is either 0 or dim $\rho$, then $H$ is the intersections of $\ker \rho$ for those $\rho$ for which this inner product is not 0, and intersections of kernels of irreducible characters are precisely the normal subgroups of $G$.

Indeed, by Frobenius recoprocity, $$ \langle \text{Ind}_H^G(1),\rho\rangle = \langle 1,\text{Res}_H\rho\rangle =\dim\rho\Longrightarrow H\leq \ker\rho. $$ This gives you the inclusion $H\leq \bigcap \ker\rho,$ the intersection running over those $\rho$ with non-trivial inner product with $\text{Ind}_H^G1$. To get equality, notice that the hypothesis on the inner products implies that the dimensions of $\text{Ind}_H^G1$ and of $\text{Ind}_K^G 1$, where $K=\bigcap \ker\rho$, are the same.

  • $\begingroup$ I see that containment in the kernels is clear, how do you get equality? $\endgroup$ – Stopple Jun 13 '13 at 17:29
  • $\begingroup$ By comparing dimensions. The hypothesis implies that $\dim(\text{Ind}_H^G 1) = \dim(\text{Ind}_K^G 1)$, where $K=\bigcap \ker\rho$, the intersection taken over those $\rho$ with non-zero inner product with $\text{Ind}_H^G1$. $\endgroup$ – Alex B. Jun 13 '13 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ I have edited the answer. You can also observe directly that the hypothesis gives an isomorphism of representations $\text{Ind}_H^G1$ and $\text{Ind}_K^G1$, where $K$ is the intersection of kernels. $\endgroup$ – Alex B. Jun 13 '13 at 19:42

Yes. If an irreducible representation $U$ occurs in the induced representation with multiplicity $\dim(U)$, then it follows by Frobenius Reciprocity that the trivial representation occurs with multiplicity $\dim(U)$ in the restriction of $U$ to $H$, and so $H$ acts trivially on $U$. So your condition implies that $H$ acts trivially on the induced representation, which is only the case if $H$ is normal in $G$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.