21
$\begingroup$

Suppose $X$ is a projective variety over $\mathbb C$. I am happy to entertain more or different adjectives — I'm not looking for the most general statement, but rather to understand when and how smooth-manifold intuition leads me astray. I know very little algebraic geometry, and so please forgive and correct me if a statement below is mistaken.

It is rare for a line bundle $\mathcal L \to X$ to have a nowhere-vanishing section, and when it does, there are usually very few (only $\mathbb C^\times$ many). Suppose instead that I ask for a weaker structure than for $\mathcal L$ to have a section, but rather let me ask only that it has a flat connection. My question is:

In algebraic geometry, how often does a line bundle have a flat connection? When it has a flat connection, how many flat connections can it have?

$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

30
$\begingroup$

I presume that your variety $X$ is smooth.

Consider the additive map $\mathrm d\log \colon \mathscr O_X^*\to \Omega^1_X$ that sends $f$ to $\mathrm df/f$. It induces a map $c_1$ in cohomology from $H^1(X,\mathscr O_X^*)$ to $H^1(X,\Omega^1_X)$ — a coherent avatar of the first Chern class. By Hodge Theory, $H^1(X,\Omega^1_X)$ is a subspace of $H^2(X,\mathbf C)$ and the two notions of first Chern class coincide.

A line bundle $\mathscr L$ has a connection if and only if its first Chern class $c_1(\mathscr L)\in H^1(X,\Omega^1_X)$ vanishes. The proof is straightforward: take an open cover $(U_i)$ of $X$, an invertible section $s_i$ of $\mathscr L$ on $U_i$ and the associated cocycle $(f_{ij})$ representing your line bundle in $H^1(X,\mathscr O_X^*)$. A connection $\nabla$ maps $s_i$ to $s_i\otimes\omega_i$, for some 1-form $\omega_i\in H^0(U_i,\Omega^1_X)$. The condition that these $s_i\otimes\omega_i$ come from a global connection on $X$ is exactly the vanishing of $c_1(\mathscr L)$.

It is a non-trivial fact that if $\mathscr L$ has an algebraic connection, then it is automatically flat. Torsten Ekedahl gave an algebraic proof on this thread of MO (Ekedahl also observes that $p$th power of line bundles in characteristic $p$ have an integrable connection), but an analytic proof seems easy. The algebraic connexion $\nabla$ gives rise to a connexion $\nabla+\bar\partial$ on the associated holomorphic line bundle. One checks that the curvature of this connection is a $(2,0)$-form, while it should be a $(1,1)$-form. Consequently, it vanishes.

When non empty, the set of flat connections on a vector bundle $\mathscr E$ is an affine space under $H^0(X,\Omega^1_X\otimes\mathscr E\mathit{nd}(\mathscr E))$, a finite dimensional vector space. In our case, $\mathscr L$ is a line bundle, hence $\mathscr E\mathit{nd}(\mathscr L)$ is the trivial line bundle so that we get $H^0(X,\Omega^1_X)$.

NB. Following the comment of Ben McKay, I edited the last paragraph.

$\endgroup$
13
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Isn't $End(L)$ trivial, since $L$ is a line bundle? $\endgroup$
    – Ben McKay
    Commented Mar 8, 2013 at 15:09
  • $\begingroup$ @Ben McKay. You're absolutely right... I'll edit the answer. $\endgroup$
    – ACL
    Commented Mar 9, 2013 at 0:48
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A priori, there is no reason for the connection $\nabla +\overline{partial}$ to have curvature of type (1,1) (and hence to be flat). It is the curvature of the Chern connection that satisfies a reality property (if you have fixed an hermitian structure). Also, you mean to write that $\nabla+\overline{\partial}$ is a connection on the complex line bundle corresponding to $\mathscr{L}$, not the holomorphic one. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 10, 2013 at 19:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You do have though that all of the Chern classes vanish: the characteristic ring is generated by the Atiyah class, which is zero: see Thm 4 in Atiyah's paper. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 10, 2013 at 19:52
  • $\begingroup$ @ACL - could you give a reference to a proof that $H^0(X,\Omega^1_X\otimes\mathscr E\mathit{nd}(\mathscr E))$ is finite dimensional? $\endgroup$
    – user122276
    Commented May 26, 2021 at 14:25
3
$\begingroup$

A vector bundle with an algebraic connection has to have vanishing all Chern classes, at least in characteristic zero. I remember that this follows from the vanishing of the "Atiyah class", but I don't know the details.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ @ Piotr Achinger Yes, you are right. However, I can't find the detail on any book. Hence, I write the detail by myself. If you like, I can sent it to you. $\endgroup$
    – swalker
    Commented Nov 25, 2016 at 3:39
-1
$\begingroup$

Question: "In algebraic geometry, how often does a line bundle have a flat connection? When it has a flat connection, how many flat connections can it have?"

Comment: Over other fields/rings than the complex number field you get similar results using basic properties of the $\operatorname{Ext}$ and $\operatorname{Hom}$ functors: If $\pi: X \rightarrow S:=Spec(A)$ is any scheme and if $L\in Pic(X)$ is any invertible sheaf, there is the Atiyah-sequence

$$A1.\text{ } 0 \rightarrow \Omega^1_{X/S} \otimes L \rightarrow J^1(L) \rightarrow L \rightarrow 0$$

which is split iff $L$ has a connection. You get an extension class

$$a(L) \in \operatorname{Ext}^1_{\mathcal{O}_X}(L, L\otimes \Omega^1_{X/S}) \cong $$

$$ \operatorname{Ext}^1_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\mathcal{O}_X, L^*\otimes L\otimes \Omega^1_{X/S}) \cong \operatorname{Ext}^1_{\mathcal{O}_X}( \mathcal{O}_X, \Omega^1_{X/S}) \cong $$

$$ \operatorname{H}^1(X, \Omega^1_{X/S}).$$

You may view the image of the class $a(L)=c_1(L)$ under the above isomorphisms as the first Chern class of $L$. Hence $c_1(L)=0$ iff $L$ has a connection. The set of connections on $L$ is parametrized by the set

$$\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(L, L \otimes \Omega^1_{X/S}) \cong $$

$$\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\mathcal{O}_X,\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(L, L \otimes \Omega^1_{X/S})) \cong $$

$$\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\mathcal{O}_X, L^*\otimes L \otimes \Omega^1_{X/S}) \cong $$

$$\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\mathcal{O}_X, \Omega^1_{X/S}) \cong \operatorname{H}^0(X, \Omega^1_{X/S}).$$

More generally if $E$ is any locally trivial finite rank sheaf you get a class

$$a(E) \in \operatorname{H}^1(X, \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(E) \otimes \Omega^1_{X/S}).$$

with the same properties. The "parameter-space of connections" is the set

$$\operatorname{H}^0(X, \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(E) \otimes \Omega^1_{X/S}).$$

Remark: You may let $S$ be any base-scheme and the above results still hold.

The following link gives an obstruction sequence for a general $E$ to have a flat connection using non-abelian extensions of (sheaves of) Lie-Rinehart algebras:

When do flat holomorphic connections exist?

When $E$ is a locally trivial finite rank sheaf with a connection $\nabla$, there is an exact sequence

$$0 \rightarrow \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(E) \rightarrow \Theta_X(E, \nabla) \rightarrow \Theta_X \rightarrow 0$$

which splits iff $E$ has a flat connection. By definition

$$ \Theta_X(E, \nabla):= \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(E)\oplus \Theta_X$$

with the following Lie-structure:

If $x,y \in \Theta(U)$ and $\phi, \psi \in \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(E)(U)$, define

$$ [(\phi,x),(\psi,y)]:=([\phi,\psi]+[\nabla(x), \psi]-[\nabla(y), \phi]+R_{\nabla}(x,y), [x,y]),$$

where $R_{\nabla}$ is the curvature of $\nabla$.

Note: When you add a potential $P$ to a flat connection $\nabla$, it does not follow that the new connection $\nabla+P$ is flat.

Example: If $X\subseteq \mathbb{P}^n_{\mathbb{C}}$ is a smooth quasi projective variety with a finite rank locally trivial sheaf $E$ with an algebraic connection $\nabla$, you get an extension class

$$na(E,\nabla) \in \operatorname{Ext}^1(\Theta_X, \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(E))$$

and there is a canonical map

$$c:\operatorname{Ext}^1(\Theta_X, \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(E)) \rightarrow \operatorname{H}^1(X, \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(E) \otimes \Omega^1_X),$$

with $na(E,\nabla)="0"$ iff $E$ has a flat algebraic connection $\nabla':=\nabla+P$. The two classes $c(na(E,\nabla))$ and $a(E)$ live in the same vector space. One may wonder if these two classes are related: If $c(na(E,\nabla))$ is a multiple of $a(E)$, it follows $a(E)=0$ may imply $na(E,\nabla)=0$. The "non-abelian cohomology set"

$$\operatorname{Ext}^1(\Theta_X, \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(E))$$

does not have the structure of an abelian group in general. I believe it has been conjectured that if $a(E)=0$ it follows $na(E,\nabla)=0$ but do not have a precise reference.

Example: For a line bundle it follows $\operatorname{End}(L) \cong \mathcal{O}_X$ and you get an exact sequence

$$NA.\text{ }0 \rightarrow \mathcal{O}_X \rightarrow \Theta_X(L, \nabla) \rightarrow \Theta_X \rightarrow 0.$$

By the above argument it follows this sequence splits over the complex numbers.

Example: Let for simplicity $L\in \operatorname{Pic}(A)$ be an invertible $A$-module with a connection $\nabla: T \rightarrow \operatorname{End}_k(L)$ with $T:=\operatorname{Der}_k(A)$. Let $ad\nabla: T \rightarrow \operatorname{End}_k(L^* \otimes_A L) \cong \operatorname{End}_k(A)$. It follows for any endomorphism $\phi_a \in L^*\otimes L$ we have

$$ad\nabla(x)(\phi_a)=\phi_{x(a)},$$

where $\phi_a(u):=au$ for $u\in L$. It follows $ad\nabla$ is a flat connection. We get an extension

$$NA1.\text{ } 0 \rightarrow L^* \otimes L \rightarrow L^* \otimes L \oplus T \rightarrow^p T \rightarrow 0$$

where the middle term has the following Lie structure:

$$[(a,x),(b,y)]:=(x(b)-y(a) +R_{\nabla}(x,y),[x,y])$$

for $a,b\in L^* \otimes L, x,y \in T$.

Lemma: A section $s: T\rightarrow A\oplus T$ with $s(x):=(\rho(x),x)$ is $A$-linear and a map of $k$-Lie algebras iff the map $\nabla^*:=\nabla+\rho$ is a flat connection.

Hence sequence $A1$ is the obstruction for the existence of a connection and $NA1$ is the obstruction for the existence of a flat connection.

If $(L,\nabla)$ is a flat connection on a line bundle $L$ it follows sections $\rho$ of $NA$ are in 1-1 correspondence with flat connections $\nabla^*:=\nabla+\rho$. Hence you may view the "set of sections" of $NA$ as the "parameter-space of flat connections". There is an algebraic group/a group scheme acting on this parameter space and you may form the "(stack) quotient".

If $X$ is a complex projective manifold it follows $NA$ should have a section for any $L\in Pic(X)$.

Note: Let $X \subseteq \mathbb{P}^n_S$ be projective over $S:=Spec(A)$ with $A$ a finitely generated algebra over a field $k$ and let $E$ be a coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. It follows

$$\operatorname{H}^0(X, \operatorname{End}(E)\otimes \Omega^1_{X/S})$$

is a finitely generated $A$-module. This is Hartshorne, Thm II.5.19. In particular if $A$ equals $k$, it follows the group is a finite dimensional $k$-vector space.

Note: The field $k$ may be arbitrary, hence the results are valid for a real algebraic variety $X$ and a finite rank vector bundle $E$ on $X$. The "Serre-Swan theorem" gives an equivalence of categories between the category of real smooth finite rank vector bundles on a real smooth manifold $M$ and finite rank projective $R:=C^{\infty}(M)$-modules. The ring $R$ is a commutative unital algebra over the field of real numbers, and the sequences $A1,NA1$ exist for any $R$-module $L$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ It seems like you're answering about connections in general, while the question was about flat connections specifically. $\endgroup$
    – Gro-Tsen
    Commented May 26, 2021 at 14:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Gro-Tsen - there is a non-abelian Atiyah sequence $NA$ which is split iff the line bundle $L$ has a flat connection. This sequence is not mentioned in the original answer. In fact the accepted answer claims that if $\nabla$ is flat and you add a potential $P$, it follows the new connection $\nabla^*:=\nabla+P$ is flat - this is not correct in general. $\endgroup$
    – user122276
    Commented May 27, 2021 at 12:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .