Let $\mathcal{X}\to\Delta$, $\Delta \subset \mathbb{C}$ is the unit disk, be a smooth family of varieties whose fibers over $t\neq 0$ are smooth and the central fiber $\mathcal{X}_0$ is a nice simple normal crossing divisor (in $\mathcal{X}$).

Let $\mathcal{X}_0=\cup X_i$, and define $X_I=\cap_{i\in I} X_i$.

This assumption imposes some relations between the $N_{X_{I}}^{X_{J}}$, $J\subset I$. For example if $\mathcal{X}_0=X_1\cup_D X_2$ ($D=X_{12}$), then $N_D^{X_1}\otimes N_{D}^{X_2}=\mathcal{O}_D$ is trivial, and conversely if these condition holds, then there is a smooth one parameter family realizing that.


Is it known under what conditions, a simple normal crossing space can be realized as the central fiber of a smooth family? Is it known if those relations are enough for the existence of such family (similar to example above)

In general, is this probelm studied in literature or not?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ have you read thius? jstor.org/discover/10.2307/… $\endgroup$
    – roy smith
    Oct 25, 2012 at 2:27
  • $\begingroup$ No, thanks. I will see if it has any answer for this question. Meanwhile I will appreciate if someone can give a concrete answer. $\endgroup$ Oct 25, 2012 at 2:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It seems to me that the paper referenced by roy smith is precisely intended to address your question. The length of the paper suggests that the author did not find any simple necessary and sufficient conditions of the sort you seem to be looking for. Since the paper was written in 1983, there may be additional progress since then. However, this at least shows that the problem is, in fact, studied in the literature. $\endgroup$ Oct 25, 2012 at 13:25

1 Answer 1


The more modern approach to the question adressed by Friedman is via logarithmic geometry. Most relevant for your question is the paper of Kawamata and Nammikawa, "Logarithmic deformations of normal crossing varieties and smoothing of degenerate Calabi-Yau varieties," Invent. Math., 118, (1994) 395-409. However, even that paper did not use the language of log geometry as thoroughly as possible.

Briefly put, suppose we are given a normal crossings variety $X$. The first step is to understand when one can put a log structure on $X$ of the correct sort, (I'll write the log scheme as $X^{\dagger}$) along with a log smooth morphism $X^{\dagger}\rightarrow {\rm Spec} k^{\dagger}$, where the latter is the "standard log point", i.e., a point with associated monoid $k^{\times}\oplus {\bf N}$, where ${\bf N}$ denote the natural numbers. Kawamata and Namikawa show that this can be done precisely when Friedman's d-semistability condition holds, i.e., when the local $T^1$ sheaf $N_D:={\mathcal Ext}^1(\Omega^1_X,{\mathcal O}_X)$ is the structure sheaf of the singular locus of $X$.

One then applies log deformation theory, which was sketched out by K. Kato in his original paper on logarithmic geometry, "Logarithmic structures of Fontaine-Illusie," and fleshed out by F. Kato in http://arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9406004

Kawamata and Namikawa in fact show the log deformation theory of a normal crossings Calabi-Yau is unobstructed, using similar techniques for proving the Bogomolov-Tian-Todorov theorem. So for d-semistable Calabi-Yau varieties, the statement you want is true.

The advantage of using log deformation theory is that if one uses ordinary deformation theory as Friedman did, it is not likely that the deformation space will be unobstructed. Typically a normal crossings variety has many locally trivial deformations which give a large irreducible component of the deformation space, but most of these locally trivial deformations do not smooth because they don't carry log structures. Log deformation theory does not see these bad deformations.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.