3
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be an asymmetric connected graph. Then is it always the case that at least one of the eigenvectors of its adjacency matrix $A$ consists entirely of distinct entries?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By asymmetric, you mean the automorphism group is trivial? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 8, 2012 at 18:44
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, the graph has a trivial automorphism group. And yes I'm assuming a connected graph. I edited the question to reflect this. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 9, 2012 at 6:23
  • $\begingroup$ I'm curious what was the motivation for the question. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 9, 2012 at 12:42

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

I think the answer is no. Take the Frucht Graph, the simplest nontrivial asymmetric graph. Its adjacency matrix is

\begin{equation*} \left( \begin{array}{cccccccccccc} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\\\ 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\\\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\\\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right) \end{equation*}

none of whose eigenvectors seems to have distinct entries.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ If I entered it correctly into Maple then three of the 12 distinct eigenvalues do have eigenvectors with distinct entries. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 9, 2012 at 2:21
  • $\begingroup$ I cut and pasted the above matrix into Mathematica and it seems that all eigenvectors have repeated entries. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 9, 2012 at 3:06
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I agree.I think I got fooled when Maple took equal but not identically written algebraic integers and evaluated them slightly differently numerically. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 9, 2012 at 4:55
  • $\begingroup$ Funny that I had checked the Frucht graph before asking this question and hadn't noticed that all eigenvectors' entries were not distinct. Well spotted. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 9, 2012 at 6:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .