1) What is the proper term for a closed subgroup H of an algebraic group G such that every linear representation of H arises as the restriction of a representation of G?
2) Where can I read about this?
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community1) What is the proper term for a closed subgroup H of an algebraic group G such that every linear representation of H arises as the restriction of a representation of G?
2) Where can I read about this?
The most likely answer to 1) is that no "proper term" exists. In any case, it would be helpful to clarify the framework of the question a little more: are you dealing with linear algebraic groups just in charactristic 0 or more generally? are the (presumably rational) representations in question assumed to be finite dimensional? are there nontrivial examples you have in mind of such behavior?
In characteristic 0, for example, any finite dimensional rational representation of a reductive subgroup of maximal rank in a semisimple group (such as a Levi subgroup in some parabolic) will be a direct sum of irreducible representations with a highest weight along with possibly 1-dimensional representations. These irreducibles rarely extend to the full group; this is obvious for the latter types, since a connected semisimple group has no nontrivial characters. On the other hand, it's usually impossible to extend an arbitrary representation of a solvable or non-connected subgroup, etc. In prime characteristic, such things become far more complicated as representations proliferate.
Concerning 2), you might get some perspective by looking at the work of Cline-Parshall-Scott which often has cohomological motivations. For example, in a two-part paper published in Invent. Math. and J. London Math. Soc. (1978-79) they looked explicitly at what conditions are required for a representation of a Borel subgroup to extend to a representation of an ambient semisimple group.
ADDED: The original wording of the question threw me off, and I didn't stop long enough to figure out what you were really asking about. The word you want is observable: not especially illuminating, but hard to find a short substitute for. This comes out of late 1950s work by Hochschild and Mostow on extending representations of subgroups of Lie groups. I think they introduced the term "observable subgroup" in the algebraic groups context in their 1963 paper (online via JSTOR):
Białynicki-Birula, A.; Hochschild, G.; Mostow, G.D., Extensions of representations of algebraic linear groups. Amer. J. Math. 85 1963 131–144
One is given a linear algebraic group $G$ (over an algebraically closed field, sometimes of characteristic 0 in the literature), together with a closed subgroup $H$. In the context of finite dimensional rational representations, one says $H$ is "observable in $G$" if each such representation of $H$ occurs as a subrepresentation of a representation of $G$ (meaning as an $H$-submodule). So in this sense representations of $H$ "extend" to representations of $G$. The difficulty is to identify which closed subgroups of $G$ are in fact observable. One equivalent condition is that $G/H$ should be open in an affine variety.
The question merges into invariant theory in the work of Frank Grosshans, for example in his paper: Observable groups and Hilbert’s fourteenth problem, Amer. J. Math. 95 (1973), 229–253. Cline-Parshall-Scott extended Richardson's work on affine quotients $G/H$ with their notion of "strongly observable". Most of the literature in these directions is scattered and probably not definitive.