Let $A \in \mathbb R^{n\times n}$ be a positive semi-definite matrix, and let $b \in \mathbb R^n$. For a random vector $x \sim \mathcal N(0, I_{n\times n})$, consider the random matrices $$ B_1 = A + xx^T, \qquad B_2 = A + (x + b)(x + b)^T. $$ Intuitively, it seems likely to me that the following inequality should be satisfied for all $r \geq 0$: $$ \mathbb P[\lambda_{\min}(B_1) ≥ r] \leq \mathbb P[\lambda_{\min}(B_2) ≥ r] \,. $$ However, I have searched the literature (particularly the literature on non-central Wishart distributions) and have not found an answer to this question. Does this follow from classical results, or is it an open question?
EDIT
In fact, the inequality does not hold. Indeed, in the example suggested by @Ben Deitmar, it is the other way around. Consider the case $$ A = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad b = \begin{pmatrix} x \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}. $$
It looks as if, in the limit $x \to \infty$, the random varibale $\lambda_{\min}(B_2)$ tends to 1 in probability. The Julia code, for reproducibility purposes:
using LinearAlgebra
using LaTeXStrings
using Plots
A = [2. 0.; 0. 1.]
b = [5., 0.]
n = 10^5
λ₁, λ₂ = zeros(n), zeros(n)
for i in 1:n
x = randn(2)
B₁ = A + x*x'
B₂ = A + (b + x)*(b + x)'
λ₁[i] = eigvals(B₁)[1]
λ₂[i] = eigvals(B₂)[1]
end
λ₁ = sort(λ₁)
λ₂ = sort(λ₂)
plot(λ₁, (1:n)/n, label=L"CDF of $\lambda_{\min}(B_1)$")
plot!(λ₂, (1:n)/n, label=L"CDF of $\lambda_{\min}(B_2)$")
savefig("CDF.png")