6
$\begingroup$

This question was asked at the french ENS oral examination. I do not really know how to approach it. I think the answers no.

What I've gathered so far :

Lets call $T$ the subset of $\mathbb{R}^2$ in the title (for obvious reasons). If the union exists, by Baire's theorem it must be uncountable. Let $E$ be the set of maps $T \to \mathbb{R}^2$ of which the images disjointly cover $\mathbb{R}^2$.

Since the domain is compact every map is uniformly continuous : by uncountability, for all $\epsilon > 0$ there is an $\eta$ such that an uncountably infinite number of maps $f$ verify the property $|x - y| \leq \eta \implies |f(x) - f(y)| < \epsilon$.

By uncountability, I also think an uncountably infinite number of the maps above should also have their image in a well chosen compact region of the plane, denoted $K$.

Let $E'$ be an uncoutably infinite subset of $E$ where all the maps verify the two properties ("uniform" uniform continuity and image in a given compact set $K$). For any finite subset of $T$, by using successive extractions I should be able to find a sequence of maps $(f_n)$ in $E'$ such that for any point $x$ in this finite subset the images $f_n(x)$ converges to a point $y \in K$. By using uniform uniform continuity I hoped to find that the maps $f_n$ would be arbitrarily close to one another and necessarily cross.

However, the more I think about this approach the less likely I think it is to work.

Would anyone have an idea ?

$\endgroup$
0

3 Answers 3

7
$\begingroup$

Such sets are called triods. R. L. Moore (Concerning triods in the plane and the junction points of plane continua, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 14, 1928, pp. 85-88) proved that every set of pairwise disjoint triods in the plane is countable.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.14.1.85

$\endgroup$
2
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot ! Didn't know they were called triods. Further googling led me to this beautiful Elementary proof : ams.org/proc/1970-025-04/S0002-9939-1970-0263049-9/… $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2022 at 8:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In Peter Winkler's (first) book Mathematical Puzzles: A Connoisseur's Collection, he calls this problem "Ys in the plane." On page 137, he gives a proof which is basically Pittman's proof, except that it's phrased in terms of the non-planarity of the gas-water-electricity graph $K_{3,3}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2022 at 23:18
1
$\begingroup$

One sketch is as follows: For each Y-set, we can put a small open disk in the vertex, such that the three prongs divide the disk in three sectors. In each sector, we can find a rational coordinate, since the disk is open, so for each Y-figure, we can associate a triple of rational points.

Now, no two Y-figures can produce the same triple of rational points, so the set of Y-figures must produce an injection to sextuples of rational numbers. Hence, we can only have a countable many disjoint Y-figures in the plane.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ The unclear part of your argument is "divide into three regions". The set is just homeomorphic to Y so it can be very complicated. Your argument is well known when the Y is say piecewise linear. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 25, 2022 at 12:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What about: we can find a small circle centered at the vertex, such that each of the three prongs intersects it. Each prong then has an earliest point where it intersects the circle, so there are three non-intersecting paths from the vertex to the circle. Now use the Jordan curve theorem to get three disjoint open regions bounded by the prongs and circle. $\endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    Commented Apr 25, 2022 at 13:20
  • $\begingroup$ @NikWeaver this is exactly what Pittman's proof does (see the first comment below bof's answer) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 25, 2022 at 13:22
1
$\begingroup$

The question been answered in How many tacks fit in the plane?.

In fact Moore proved a multidimensional version of the theorem: only countably many sets homeomorphic to the $n$-dimensional disc with an orthogonal segment attached in the center can be embedded in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ as pairwise disjoint sets.

While it sounds like an abstract topological problems, it has apllications to Sobolev spaces: https://mathoverflow.net/a/297607/121665.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .