1
$\begingroup$

Def. If $X\subseteq G$, we say that $X$ is $k$-large in $G$ if the intersection of any $k$ left translates of $X$ is non-empty. (See the notion of largeness which was introduced in "Largeur et nilpotence".)

Let $G$ be a soluble group with derived length $n$, $p$ be a prime number and $\phi\in\text{Aut}(G)$ be of order $p$. Assume that

  1. The set $\{x\in G: \prod_{k=0}^{p-1}x^{\phi^k}=1\}$ is $2^{n+1}$-large,
  2. $G/G^{(n-1)}$ is nilpotent and its nilpotency class is $2^n$,
  3. For all $x\in G$, $\prod_{k=0}^{p-1}x^{\phi^k}\in G^{(n-1)}$.

Then is $G$ nilpotent (of nilpotency class $2^{n+1}$)?

($G^{(r)}$ stands for the $r$th derivation of $G$)

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please explain the motivation behind this question and why do you think it is true? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 11:54
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't this false with $G=S_3$ and $\phi$ conjugation by an element of order $2$? $\endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 11:57
  • $\begingroup$ @YiftachBarnea The motivation is giving a new version of Theorem 13 of this paper. $\endgroup$
    – MSMalekan
    Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 12:35
  • $\begingroup$ @DerekHolt, Thank you, I think you are right. I I have to rewrite my assumptions more accurately. $\endgroup$
    – MSMalekan
    Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 12:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MeisamSoleimaniMalekan: See this question, for what I think Geoff is referring to: link $\endgroup$
    – spin
    Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 14:08

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .