4
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be a quiver algebra over a field $k$ with multiplication $m$. By https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.10222.pdf definition 6, $A$ is called nearly Frobenius in case there exists a (non-zero? Was this forgotten in the definition?) linear map $\Delta : A \rightarrow A \otimes_k A$ such that the following holds:

(1) $\Delta m = (1 \otimes m) (\Delta \otimes 1)$

(2) $\Delta m = (m \otimes 1) (1 \otimes \Delta)$.

The Frobenius dimension is defined as the vector space dimension of the space of such $\Delta$ (so $A$ is nearly Frobenius iff the Frobenius dimension is non-zero?).

This a generalisation of Frobenius algebras.

Question 1: For Frobenius algebras there are many equivalent characterisations, for example $A \cong D(A)$, is there also a characterisation of nearly Frobenius algebras by some isomorphism of modules (or any other non-obvious characterisation)?

Question 2: Is there a way to calculate the Frobenius dimension using the GAP-package QPA?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I realized that I didn't look at the definition careful enough. So I have erased my first answer, since it didn't say anything useful.

The requirements actually says that

$(1)\quad \Delta(ab) = \Delta(a)b$

and

$(2)\quad \Delta(ab) = a\Delta(b).$

In other words, the linear homomorphism $\Delta\colon A \to A\otimes_k A$ should be a homomorphism of $A$-$A$-bimodules. Therefore the Frobenius dimension of an algebra is nothing else than the dimension of the space of homomorphisms

$\operatorname{Hom}_{A\otimes_k A^{\operatorname{op}}}(A,A\otimes_k A).$

This can be easily computed in QPA by the following line of commands:

Aenv := EnvelopingAlgebra( A );
P := DirectSumOfQPAModules( IndecProjectiveModules( Aenv ) );
M := AlgebraAsModuleOverEnvelopingAlgebra( A );
Length( HomOverAlgebra( M, P ) );

The last number is the Frobenius dimension of the algebra $A$.

So, Frobenius dimension = $\dim_k \operatorname{Hom}_{A\otimes_k A^{\operatorname{op}}}( A, A\otimes_k A )$.

The QPA-team.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Wow, thanks. This really simplifies it alot. Do we have $Hom_{A^e})(A,A^e) \cong Hom_A(D(A),A)$? If I remember correctly we have $Ext_{A^e}^i(A,A^e) \cong Ext^i_A(D(A),A)$ for $i \geq 1$ and it should probably also hold for $i=1$. $\endgroup$
    – Mare
    Commented Jan 27, 2020 at 22:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In Cartan-Eilenberg, Chapter 9, Corollary 4.4 says that $\operatorname{Ext}^n_{A^e}(A,\operatorname{Hom}_k(B,C)) \simeq \operatorname{Ext}^n_A(B,C)$ for a $k$-algebra $A$. Since $\operatorname{Hom}_k(B,C) \simeq \operatorname{Hom}_k(B,k)\otimes_k C$, your claim follows. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 28, 2020 at 7:39
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, it seems that Cartan-Eilenberg is still the best place to search for such isomorphisms. Your observation actually makes many results on nearly Frobenius quite easy to show and completely answers my question. I wonder whether the authors of the article are aware of this? $\endgroup$
    – Mare
    Commented Jan 28, 2020 at 9:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .