3
$\begingroup$

I have an algebraic group $G$ acting on an affine variety $X$, the orbit $O(m)$ of an element $m \in X$, and an affine curve $C$ contained in the Zariski closure $\overline{O(m)}$ of $O(m)$, such that $m \in C$.

If we define $C^\prime = C \cap O(m) $ then it's not hard to see that $C^\prime$ is open in $C$. And therefore $C^\prime$ is again affine (follows for example from an exercise in Hartshorne).

Let $p: G \to O(m)$ defined by $p(g) = g \cdot m$ be the orbit map. I want to prove that there is an affine subset $G^\prime$ of $G$ such that $p(G^\prime)$ is dense in $C^\prime$.

Is the preimage of $X^\prime$ affine? If so why? If not, how do I construct such a $G^\prime$?

For reference: The statement that such an $G^\prime$ exists can be found in the article A characterization of orbit closure and applications (MR0944153) on the first page of the proof of Theorem 1.2. Clearly he has more assumptions on $X$ and $G$, but I do not see anything else that could be useful here.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

I was able to figure out an elementary answer with some help: It seems like a good hint is to look at abstract varieties or even easier use that every quasi-affine variety is an abstract variety.

The preimage is presumably not affine, but it is a locally closed subset of $G$ since $C$ is locally closed. Therefore $p^{-1}(C)$ is a quasi-affine variety and as such it has an open cover $U_i$ where each $U_i$ has the structure of an affine varieties such that for each intersection $U_i \cap U_j$ the induced variety structures are isomorphic (see for example Hartshorne - Algebraic Geometry Section I.8 page 58 where this is stated without proof). So let

$p^{-1}(C) = U_1 \cup \dots \cup U_\alpha$.

Since $p$ is surjective we have

$C = p(U_1) \cup \dots \cup p(U_\alpha)$.

Since $C$ is irreducible it can't be the union of two proper closed subsets and therefore some $p(U_i)$ has to be dense which finishes the proof.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ That is much cleaner and more elementary. It is much better to not kill a small bird with the giant gun of GIT. $\endgroup$
    – schemer
    Commented Oct 29, 2019 at 22:50
0
$\begingroup$

I do not know if the pre-image of $ C^{'} $ (I assume that you mean $ C^{'} $ not $ X^{'} $) is affine. However, here is an idea for how to construct such a $ G^{'} $. For notational purposes I will relabel $ m $ as $ x $ so that people don't confuse $ G_{m} $ with $ \mathbb{G}_{m} $. When you said that $ x $ was an element of $ X $, I assumed that you meant that it is a closed point of $ X $.

If $ G_{x} $ is the stabilizer of the point $ x \in X $, then $ G_{x} $ acts on $ G $. Let us assume that $ G $ is quasi-projective. If we denote the maximal ideal of a closed point $ y $ by $ \mathfrak{m}_{y} $, then let $ \mathcal{L} $ be an invertible sheaf on $ O(x) $ such that $ H^{0}(O(x), \mathcal{L}) $ contains a non-constant global section $ s_{1} $ such that $ s_{1} \notin \mathfrak{m}_{x} \mathcal{L}_{x} $. Since $ O(x) $ is a sub-variety of an affine variety such an $ \mathcal{L} $ must exist.

The pull-back $ p^{\ast}(\mathcal{L}) $ is a $ G_{x} $ linearized invertible sheaf $ \mathcal{M} $ with a non-constant global section $ s $ such that $ s \notin \mathfrak{m}_{e_{G}} \mathcal{M} $. Let $ U $ be the points $ g \in G $ such that $ s_{g} \notin \mathfrak{m}_{g} \mathcal{M}_{g} $. The neighborhood $ U $ is an open, affine $ G_{x} $-stable sub-scheme of $ G $. Assume that $ U \cong \operatorname{Spec}(A) $.

Since $ U $ is $ G_{x} $ stable, there is a map $ p_{1}: U \to U//G_{x} $ (here $ U//G_{x} $ denotes $ \operatorname{Spec}(A^{G_{x}}) $). By the universal property of categorical quotients there is a map $ f: U//G_{x} \to p(U) $ such that $ f \circ p_{1} = p $. Since quotients are unique, $ U//G_{x} \cong p(U) $. The map $ p_{1} $ is affine, so since $ p(U) \cap C^{'} $ is non-empty as $ x \in p(U) \cap C^{'} $, it is an open sub-scheme of $ C^{'} $. Therefore, $ U $ should be the affine set you seek.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I suppose that all my points should be closed (my variety is $mod^d_A(k)$ and an element of it can be viewed as an alpha-tuple (alpha is the dimension of the f.d. $k$-algebra $A$) of dxd matrices. This should be closed. But as I was thinking about it in the sense of varieties as in the first section of Hartshorne I do not realy think about open and closed points. I see that you assume that G is quasi-projective and I am not sure about that in my case ($G=GL_d(k)$). I can´t say if what you are doing for the rest of the proof is correct or not because I do not know anything about sheafes. $\endgroup$
    – Bobior
    Commented Oct 23, 2019 at 21:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .