This is mostly an idle question, since I don't think I'd be able to do anything with a positive answer. But a positive answer would still be interesting, I think.
Background
An outstanding problem in algebraic combinatorics is to prove that, for any Coxeter group $W$, the coefficients of the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials $P_{x,w}(q)$ are always non-negative. Kazhdan and Lusztig showed this was the case when $W$ is the Weyl group of a semisimple Lie group by relating the coefficients to intersection cohomology of the corresponding Schubert varieties. This covers all of the cases when $W$ is finite except the non-crystallographic dihedral groups and the exceptional groups $H_3, H_4$. In the dihedral case all of the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials are equal to $1$, and in the exceptional cases non-negativity is known through computer calculations (see, for example, du Cloux). However, a conceptual proof in this case is still lacking.
In another question I asked about Coxeter groups that aren't Weyl groups, Stephen Griffeth suggested that when $W$ is a $p$-adic reflection group for some $p$, the correct analogue of an associated Lie group is a $p$-compact group. It is known (see, for example, Dwyer) that any complex reflection group - in particular, any finite Coxeter group - occurs as a $p$-adic reflection group for an appropriate choice of $p$, and I believe it is known that every $p$-adic reflection group occurs as the Weyl group of some $p$-compact group.
Question
Do $p$-compact groups have a good enough notion of "flag variety" and "intersection cohomology" that the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials for $H_3$ and $H_4$ can be interpreted in terms of them? Is there a simple description of the $p$-compact groups associated to $H_3$ and $H_4$, say, when $p = 11$? (This is the smallest prime such that $H_3$ and $H_4$ occur as a $p$-adic reflection group.)