2
$\begingroup$

An overring of an integral domain is a domain lying between it and its quotient field. Is it possible to have an overring $S$ of an integral domain $R$ such that $S$ has two maximal ideals $\mathfrak{m}$ and $\mathfrak{n}$ with $R \cap \mathfrak{m} \subsetneq R \cap \mathfrak{n}$? I think this should be possible but I can't come up with an example. Such an overring $S$ of $R$ cannot be flat or integral over $R$.

I feel like it should be straightforward to come up with an example or prove that there can't be such an example, but thus far all of my attempts have failed. I posted the question first on Math StackExchange but didn't get any replies.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Let $k$ be a field and start with $S_0:=k[x,y]$. (Ultimately, $S$ will be a localization of $S_0$). Let $\mathfrak{m}_0=(y)$ and $\mathfrak{n}_0=(x,y-1)$. In the affine plane $P:=\mathrm{Spec}(S_0)$, these are respectively the generic point of the $x$-axis and the closed point $(0,1)$.

Put $z=xy\in S_0$ and $R=k[x,z]\subset S_0$: the inclusion corresponds to the map $\phi:(a,b)\mapsto(a,ab)$ from $P$ to $P':=\mathrm{Spec}(R)$ (also isomorphic to $\mathbb{A}^2_k$, with coordinates $x,z$). Clearly, $\phi$ contracts the whole $y$-axis to the point $(0,0)$, and sends the $x$-axis to the $x$-axis. In other words, $\mathfrak{n}_0\cap R=(x,z)$ and $\mathfrak{m}_0\cap R=(z)$, so we have $\mathfrak{m}_0\cap R\subsetneq\mathfrak{n}_0\cap R$.

Now of course $\mathfrak{m}_0$ is not maximal. But let $S:=(S_0)_{\mathfrak{m}_0}\cap(S_0)_{\mathfrak{n}_0}\subset k(x,y)=k(x,z)$: you can check that this is a semilocal ring having $\mathfrak{m}:=\mathfrak{m}_0S$ and $\mathfrak{n}:=\mathfrak{n}_0S$ as distinct maximal ideals, sitting respectively above $\mathfrak{m}_0$ and $\mathfrak{n}_0$ (in $S_0$) and above $(z)$ and $(x,z)$ (in $R$).

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .