3
$\begingroup$

Is there any nice categorization of degrees of sets which are many-one reducible to $0^{\omega}$? ($0^{\omega}$ is the set whose nth column answers which $\Sigma_n$ statements are true in $(\mathbb{N},+,\cdot)$.) For instance, there are sets S which are turing above each $0^n$, and $S^{(2)}\equiv_T 0^{\omega}$. Can such a set be many-one reducible to $0^{\omega}$? If not, how about any set $S<_T 0^{\omega}$ above each $0^n$?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by degrees of set? $\endgroup$
    – abcdxyz
    Mar 30, 2010 at 10:10
  • $\begingroup$ I mean the Turing degree of the set. This is meant to ask about the interplay between a set being turing above each $0^n$ vs. it being many-one below $0^{\omega}$. The constructions that I've seen of sets turing strictly below $0^{\omega}$ but above each $0^n$ are far from producing many-one reductions from $0^{\omega}$. $\endgroup$ Mar 30, 2010 at 10:38
  • $\begingroup$ By the way Uri, welcome to MO and thanks for asking this excellent question! $\endgroup$ Mar 30, 2010 at 21:30
  • $\begingroup$ Yes Uri, welcome to MO! I'm not sure what kind of characterization you're looking for, since being many-one reducible to 0^omega seems already like a good characterization, when one is used to thinking about Turing degrees. Do you know already how the m-1 degree of 0^omega interacts with the T-degree of 0^omega? $\endgroup$ Mar 31, 2010 at 1:21
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, Joel. I don't really know much about the many-1 degrees within the Turing degree of $0^{\omega}$, which is definitely interesting in it's own right. To be honest, I don't personally know much about the analogous question for any Turing degree above $0$. The intended question was about Turing degrees which contain a set which is many-one reducible to $0^{\omega}$, mostly because I was afraid to broach the issue of the many-one refinement of a single turing degree or to leave the comfort of the Turing degrees entirely. $\endgroup$ Mar 31, 2010 at 9:01

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Sorry for answering my own question, but I'm still hoping for a characterization of some kind.

A partial answer: Let $S$ be the result of a normal jump inversion forcing for $0^{\omega}$ with added requirements that the nth column is $0^n$ modulo a finite amount. This yields a degree many-one below $0^{\omega}$, even many-one above each $0^n$, whose jump is $0^{\omega}$.

The reason S is many-one below $0^{\omega}$ is that we know that the algorithm gives uniformly an answer for the nth bit from $0^{n}$, since no higher requirements have been initialized by that point. So, running the turing algorithm from $0^{\omega}$ is the same as running the corresponding algorithm from $0^n$. The outcome is an arithmetical fact, so can be checked in one query of $0^{\omega}$.

It appears that the many-one degrees below $0^{\omega}$ (many-one) above each $0^n$ is a rich enough structure, since it contains $[S,0^{\omega}]_m$.

It seems possible that similarly intertwining requirements, we can get a set whose double-jump is $0^{\omega}$ above each $0^n$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Uri, you seem to have a double identity! Try using the same ID all the time. If your double earns some points, contact administrators or drop a message on tea.mathoverflow.net so they can merge your twin with your regular self. $\endgroup$ Mar 30, 2010 at 21:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.