7
$\begingroup$

Can anyone sketch for me a bijective proof of the fact that the number of spanning trees of the complete graph on $n$ vertices, $K_n$ (given by the formula $ t_n = n^{n-2}$), satisfies $ t_n = \frac{n}{2} \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} {n-2 \choose k-1} t_{k} t_{n-k} $? Sasha Postnikov suggested that I take a look at http://math.mit.edu/~apost/papers/AbelHurwitz.pdf but despite a fairly strong resemblance between his identities and mine I don't see how to link them.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ For similar recurrences (and a great reference on all sorts of results on counting labeled trees), see J. W. Moon's Counting Labelled Trees, especially section 3.8, math.ucla.edu/~pak/hidden/papers/…. $\endgroup$
    – Ira Gessel
    Commented Nov 17, 2016 at 17:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This fact has been recently rediscovered and discussed at mathoverflow.net/questions/273399/… , where I gave a different combinatorial proof. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 26, 2017 at 23:31

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

I believe this is the proof Postnikov suggested at CCCC LXI. Let us say that $K_n$ has vertices $1,2,\ldots,n$. Imagine a spanning tree of $K_n$ as being rooted at $1$. To any spanning tree $T$, we associate $T'$, the part of the tree at or below the vertex $2$ in this tree, and $T''$, the other part of the tree (which at least contains the root vertex $1$). Say $|T'| = k$ with $1 \leq k \leq n-1$. Then there are $\binom{n-2}{k-1}$ possible sets of labels for $T'$, $t_k$ possible trees for $T'$ given such labels, $t_{n-k}$ trees for $T''$ (whose set of labels is now determined), and $n-k$ places to "stick" $T'$ into $T''$ (which amounts to a choice of which vertex in $T''$ the vertex $2$ is a child of). This proves $$t_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} (n-k) \binom{n-2}{k-1} t_k t_{n-k}.$$

Your equation then follows by grouping the term $k$ with the term $n-k$ in that sum, and then redistributing.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ That's a nice style of argument (and it helps me get a better feel for Postnikov's point of view). Thanks for explaining it to me. (By the way, I think Sunday's meeting was officially reckoned as the 60th meeting of the Cambridge Combinatorics and Coffee Club, not the 61st; not that it matters.) $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 4, 2014 at 4:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .