5
$\begingroup$

I was trying to find the free metabelian group of rank 2, and I realized that the wreath product of Z and Z is metabelian and has only 2 generators in its minimal generating set. I could not find a way to extend this to another metabelian group without adding another generator. So my question is: Is the free metabelian group of rank 2 isomorphic to the wreath product of Z and Z?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, it is not. It is a proper quotient. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 12:40
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, so how do we describe the free metabelian group? $\endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 12:43
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe a good way to find the structure of the group is to find the freest groups with two generators that are metabelian and also have exponent n. If I work it out for enough n, it may give some insight into the free metabelian group. $\endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 13:04
  • $\begingroup$ If a finitely generated solvable group has finite exponent then it is finite. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 15:50
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but maybe the structure of the smaller groups may make the structure of the larger group a bit more clear. $\endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Commented Oct 8, 2013 at 6:23

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Let me turn my comment into an answer. Let $C$ be an infinite cyclic group generated by $t$ and $\mathbb ZC$ be the group ring. Then $\mathbb Z\wr\mathbb Z=\mathbb ZC\rtimes C$ where $C$ acts on its group ring via the regular representation. The abelianization is $\mathbb Z\times \mathbb Z$ via the map $(x,t^m)\mapsto (\epsilon(x),m)$ where $\epsilon$ is the augmentation map.

The commutator subgoup of $\mathbb Z\wr \mathbb Z$ is then the augmentation ideal $I$. As a module over the group ring of $\mathbb Z\times \mathbb Z$ we have that the first factor acts trivially and it is one-generated over the second factor (i.e., it is really a $\mathbb ZC$-module). On the other hand, if $M_2$ is the free metabelian group of rank $2$ generated by $x,y$, then it is well known that the commutator subgroup is freely generated as a module over the group ring of $\mathbb Z\times \mathbb Z$ by $[x,y]$. Thus $M_2\not\cong \mathbb Z\wr \mathbb Z$.

The word problem is very easy for $M_2$. It follows from a general result of Jorge Almeida on free objects in semidirect products of varieties and was rediscovered by Vershik many years later. Two words $w_1,w_2$ represent the same element of $M_2$ iff they represent the same element of $\mathbb Z\times \mathbb Z$ and the number of times the path labeled by $w_1$ in the Cayley graph of $\mathbb Z\times \mathbb Z$ starting at the origin traverses each edge $e$ is the same as the number of times as the path labeled by $w_2$ traverses $e$, where backward traversals are counted negatively.

Edit. Alternatively, let $E$ be the edge set of the Cayley graph of $\mathbb Z\times \mathbb Z$. Then $\mathbb Z^2$ acts on $E$ so we can form the semidirect product $\mathbb ZE\rtimes \mathbb Z^2$. The free metabelian group on $x,y$ is the subgroup generated by $(1\rightarrow x,x)$ and $(1\rightarrow y,y)$ where I view $x,y$ as generators of $\mathbb Z^2$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ So, can the free metabelian group (of rank 2 to start with) be represented by using wreath products and direct products, or does it take a more powerful notation? $\endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ It embeds in the wreath product $\mathbb Z^2\wr \mathbb Z^2$ by the Magnus embedding. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 13:55
  • $\begingroup$ On the other hand $M_2$ does not embed into $\mathbb{Z}\wr\mathbb{Z}$, by a direct verification. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 16:13
  • $\begingroup$ What about Z wr (Z^2)? $\endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Commented Oct 4, 2013 at 4:26
  • $\begingroup$ $\mathbf{Z}^2\wr\mathbf{Z}^2$ embeds as a subgroup of index 2 in $\mathbf{Z}\wr\mathbf{Z}^2$. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Sep 8, 2017 at 9:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .