While the question of positiveness was answered by Noah the other question (of equal column- (or row?) sums in A) can be dealt with the concept of Givens-rotation, where you iteratively rotate pairs of columns (or rows?) to a predefined optimization criterion. The angle for the pairwise column-rotations must then be determined by a criterion which minimizes the the difference of the sums. This should be similar to the centroid-rotation, but where we compute the maximizing criteria in the centroid-rotation we need the minimizing criteria now. Perhaps I can support this with an example later....
[update] I've got the rotation criterion for each elementary Givens-rotation. Let's -for my convenience- assume, that by $ \Sigma = A \cdot A^T$ the cholesky-factor $A$ of $ \Sigma$ is lower triangular. Then we iterate pairwise column-rotations in $A$ to pairwise and finally to completely equal column-sums. One such pairwise rotation is called "elementary Givens rotation".
The criterion-formula for the sought c as cosine of the rotation-angle and s as sine of the rotation-angle where x denotes the column with the lower index ("to the left") and y denotes the column with the higher index ("to the right") of one pairwise rotation and k goes over all row-indices is:
$$ \sum_k (x_k \cdot c - y_k \cdot s ) = \sum_k (x_k \cdot s + y_k \cdot c )$$
From this we can compute c and s as
$$ c \cdot \sum x_k - s \sum y_k = s \cdot \sum x_k + c \cdot \sum y_k \\
c \cdot \sum (x_k - y_k) = s \sum (y_k + x_k) \\
c = { a \over z } \qquad s = { b \over z } \\
\text{where } a=\sum (y_k + x_k) \qquad b=\sum (x_k - y_k) \qquad z = \sqrt{a^2+b^2}$$
Then the (elementary Givens-) rotation of the columns X and Y is
$$ X' = X\cdot c - Y \cdot s \qquad Y'=X\cdot s + Y \cdot c $$
One iteration-pass is then to apply this computation to all combinations of pairs of columns, where only always the X column means that of the smaller index.
Here is one example with a random correlation matrix, its initial cholesky-factor A and the vector SU containing the column-sums (which shall be made equal by the rotations):
| 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 |
| 0,7139 0,7003 0,0000 0,0000 |
A= | 0,9022 0,3439 0,2603 0,0000 |
| 0,5865 0,6970 0,3367 0,2382 |
=====================================
SU= | 3,2026 1,7412 0,5970 0,2382 |
One rotation on the leftmost columns gives
| 0,9590 0,2835 0,0000 0,0000 |
| 0,4861 0,8739 0,0000 0,0000 |
A= | 0,7677 0,5856 0,2603 0,0000 |
| 0,3649 0,8347 0,3367 0,2382 |
==========================================================
SU= | 2,5777 2,5777 0,5970 0,2382 |
and after 5 complete iteration passes I get
| 0,7133 0,0320 0,4429 0,5422 |
| 0,4761 0,7200 0,2739 0,4241 |
A= | 0,5372 0,3850 0,6116 0,4349 |
| 0,1242 0,7138 0,5225 0,4495 |
=========================================================
SU= | 1,8508 1,8508 1,8508 1,8508 |
where we see, that all column-sums are equal.