1
$\begingroup$

Problem: Let $a_1\dots a_k$ be integers in $Z_{n}$ such that $n=k(k-1)+1$ and that the list of differences $a_i-a_j \bmod n$ is unique to $i,j$ (for $i\neq j$). Such a set exists for $k=1\dots6,8$. No such set exists for $k=7$? (Verified by exhaustive search, but I can't figure out why that case would be different. Is it possible there's an error in my code?)

Does anyone have a quick idea or a short proof of why $k=7, n=43$ would be different? Alternatively, some larger-context work that subsumes this problem and will let me figure out why $n=7$ doesn't work?

Some properties of the $a_i$: The order doesn't matter, so you might as well list them in increasing order. The set of differences has to equal every number between 1 and $n-1$ exactly once, so there will be an equivalent of any valid set that has a $0$ and a $1$. The set of differences is equivalent under rotation of the $a_i$ by addition $\bmod n$ (by design), so pick the one that starts $0,1$ as the class representative. The $a_i$ can also be represented by the $b_i$ where $b_i=a_{i+1}-a_i$. In this case the $b_i$ form a partition of $n$ with all partial sums of sequences in order of the $b_i$ being unique. The $b_i$ are equivalent under rotation of order or flipping the order, but not in otherwise reordering. (IE, the difference list $[1,2,3,4]$ is equivalent to $[1,4,3,2]$ but not $[1,4,2,3]$.)

Background: I was doing an analysis of a card game involving restricted pairs, and found some interesting properties for sets of $n=k(k-1)+1$ symbols, taken $k$ at a time, where each two sets of $k$ symbols have exactly one pair in common.

One thing I found was that I could create a maximal set using a partition slicing strategy. But I wanted to create a pattern $(a_1 \dots a_k)$ that I could simply increment around the modulus $n$ to create every possible $k-$set. What I found was that for $k=1\dots 8, k\neq 7$, I could have at least two such patterns (removing multiples via various equivalencies). However, I have been unable to find one for $k=7$, even with an exhaustive code-based search of the $[43]^7$ vector space.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ The $a_i$ allow a "tiling" of the space by incrementing $\bmod n$. That is, if I take the $n$ additive translations of the list of $a_i$, I get $n$ $k-$element lists where each pair of translations has exactly one element in common. $\endgroup$
    – JKreft
    Commented Aug 3, 2018 at 5:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are perfect difference sets what you are after? $\endgroup$
    – Seva
    Commented Aug 3, 2018 at 7:40
  • $\begingroup$ YES! I'd never heard of them before. I have the necessary condition (in a different form) that n=j^2+j+1. Ah, I see that it's not a prime power (since k=7, j= 6), which all my other j's are. $\endgroup$
    – JKreft
    Commented Aug 3, 2018 at 8:41

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Ok, thanks to @Seva giving me the right name for these, I found out that:

  • The sets I'm describing are Perfect Difference sets.
  • The one-dimensional version I'm working with are equivalent to projective planes.
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projective_plane says that there is no plane for $j=6$ $(j^2+j+1)$, which is equivalent to my case where $k=7$ $(k^2-k+1)$.

So, not an error in my code, proven impossible prior to 1938 (as a different problem) and related to projective planes in 1938.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ more precisely, a finite projective plane with an automorphism that acts on the points by cyclic permutation. Since there's no projective plane of order 6, a fortiori there is none with a 43-cycle automorphism. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 3, 2018 at 13:48

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .