This is just for fun. You can assume you retain full use of your faculties. I don't have anything to add to the question, although that may change depending on the responses. The twenty year time period is arbitrary.
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
11
-
15$\begingroup$ This is, maybe, appropriate for a blog post. $\endgroup$– Mariano Suárez-ÁlvarezCommented Jul 10, 2010 at 13:18
-
9$\begingroup$ I encourage votes to close. $\endgroup$– S. Carnahan ♦Commented Jul 10, 2010 at 13:35
-
9$\begingroup$ Given the reaction of the public, I'd rather ask not what your question would be, but how quickly will it be closed. $\endgroup$– algoriCommented Jul 10, 2010 at 14:49
-
13$\begingroup$ Harry -- I also have several technical questions I'd very much like to see answered. But I don't seriously think that what prevents people from answering those is them spending hours trying to figure out a clever question to come up with on mathoverflow after 20 years is a coma. $\endgroup$– algoriCommented Jul 10, 2010 at 16:04
-
6$\begingroup$ @algori: the potential to generate interesting answers is not a valid reason to keep a question open. As we've discussed on meta multiple times, almost any question has this property. $\endgroup$– Qiaochu YuanCommented Jul 10, 2010 at 17:21
|
Show 6 more comments
2 Answers
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
3
Can't decide between "update me on the Millennium Problems" and "Is Wikipedia still there?"
-
4$\begingroup$ Uh, you could just check the Clay Institute website and Wikipedia, respectively. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 10, 2010 at 16:37
-
10$\begingroup$ That kind of answer would certainly reassure me that noting much had changed. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 10, 2010 at 17:01
-
3$\begingroup$ This answer-response might be the greatest thing on MO. $\endgroup$– Steve DCommented Oct 13, 2010 at 2:58