1
$\begingroup$

I have some problems to show that the following contruction defines a sheafification:

Let $\mathcal F$ be a presheaf on $X$, and let $Et(\mathcal F)$ be the etale space associated to $\mathcal F$, with $π:Et(\mathcal F)\rightarrow X$ that is the canonical map which sends a germ $s_x$ in $x$. If with $U$ we indicate a generic open set of $X$, then the set of sections of $π$ on $U$ is

$\mathcal {F}^+(U)=$ {$\widetilde{s}:U\rightarrow Et(\mathcal F)\;with\;\widetilde {s}(x)=s_x\; \forall s\in\mathcal {F}(U)$}

We give a certain topology on $Et(\mathcal F)$ and make $π$ and $\widetilde s$ continuous functions. In this way whe define the sheaf $\mathcal F^+$ of continuous sections of $π$, and the morphism (for all $U$)

$\phi(U):\mathcal F(U)\rightarrow\mathcal F^+(U)$ such that $s\mapsto\widetilde s$

Now if $\mathcal F^+$ satisfies the "universal property", it is the sheafification of $\mathcal F$. Suppose that $\psi$ is a morphism from $\mathcal F$ in a generic sheaf $\mathcal G$; how can I prove that exists a unique morphism $\theta:\mathcal F\rightarrow\mathcal G$ such that $\psi=\theta\circ\phi$?

The definition $\theta(\widetilde s)=\psi(s)$ doesn't work because $s_x=t_x$ for all $x$ doesn't imply $s=t$ in $\mathcal F(U)$ since $\mathcal F$ is a presheaf.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This can be found in standard texts like Hartshorne (without mentioning etale space) or in Mac Lane-Moerdijk. $\endgroup$ Commented May 19, 2012 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but this is another equivalent construction of a sheafification and I should prove that it is equivalent to that introduced in the Hartshorne's text. $\endgroup$
    – Galoisfan
    Commented May 19, 2012 at 16:12
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This question also appeared on Math.SE: math.stackexchange.com/questions/146996/… $\endgroup$
    – Emerton
    Commented May 20, 2012 at 5:35

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Given some section $\tilde{s} : U \to \mathrm{Et}(\mathcal{F})$, we have for all $x \in U$ some element in $\mathcal{F}_x$ and therefore in $\mathcal{G}_x$. The continuity of the map $\tilde{s}$ ensures that we can actually lift these germs to local sections around $x$. Since $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ is a homomorphism of presheaves, it doesn't matter on which neighborhood we work, and since $\mathcal{G}$ is a sheaf, we can glue these local sections to some section in $\mathcal{G}(U)$. The rest is also easy, you should be able to do this on your own.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What do you exactly mean with "...we can actually lift these germs to local sections around x"? $\endgroup$
    – Galoisfan
    Commented May 19, 2012 at 16:50
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Guess what it means ... $\endgroup$ Commented May 19, 2012 at 18:24
0
$\begingroup$

The construction of the sheafification you mention is nicely described e.g. in Tennison's book Sheaf Theory, in all details . The functor $\Gamma$ from the category of sheaf spaces to the category of presheaves, giving the sheaf of sections of a sheaf space, and the functor $L$ (your Et), from the category of presheaves to the category of sheaf spaces, are a pair of adjoint functors, and the composition $\Gamma L$ is the wanted reflection.

$\endgroup$
2

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .